Which policy do the plaintiffs disagree with in Brown V. Board of edu?....in a hurry thank you!!

History

2 answers:

Wittaler [7]3 years ago

7 0

The correct answer is separate but equal.

In the Brown vs. Board of Education case, the Brown family (with their lawyer) were arguing that the "separate but equal" facilities for black and white students was a clear violation of the 14th amendment. This was a monumental case, as segregated schools have been part of the US since the Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling in 1896. Ultimately, the Supreme Court justices sided with the Brown family saying that "separate but equal" was a clear violation of the 14th amendment. More specifically, it violated the Equal Protection clause of this amendment.

Verdich [7]3 years ago

6 0

The answer is Separate but equal.

You might be interested in

Catholics in sixteenth-century Europe who wanted to ensure their salvation purchased a/an _______ from the church.

Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

indulgence

Explanation:

youre welcome

5 0

3 years ago

This group Believe that too much democracy or people power was not a good day

nevsk [136]

Answer:

Explanation:

Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the graphs best serves as evidence that that the United States was poised to

LuckyWell [14K]

I have no idea I'm not that smart when it. comes to stuff like this sorry

3 0

4 years ago

What types of products did gatt focus on during the kennedy round?

navik [9.2K]

The correct answer is Industrial and agricultural products. GATT wanted to create better conditions and economic opportunities for Industrial and agricultural workers during the Kennedy round when tariff legislature was being made.

4 0

3 years ago

Which best explains how the change by Palestinians from violence to negotiation affected their case for independence?

mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

A) It made the case stronger by showing that Palestinians were willing to live peacefully alongside Israelis.

Explanation:

The Israeli-Palestinian clash is one of the world's longest-running and most controversial conflicts. At its heart, it is a contention between two self-determination movements— the Jewish Zionist task and the Palestinian national project— that make a case for a similar region. In any case, it is thus, a great deal more confounded than that, with apparently every reality and chronicled detail little and extensive contested by the opposite sides and their defenders.

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers