Answer:
The correct answer is D. It is not a strong example of paraphrasing. It just rearranges the original words in a new order.
Explanation:
In writing, paraphrasing implies using the ideas of an external source and author and expressing them by using your own words, because of this a strong paraphrasing would change the language used but keep the essence and main points of the original ideas. In the excerpt presented, the author tried to paraphrase a passage that describes cone snails. However, in the passage paraphrased the author uses the same terms and words than in the original passage which means he or she is not expressing the ideas of the original passage with his or her own words but only changing the order of ideas the text and therefore this is not a strong paraphrasing and can even be considered a plagiarism as the same words and ideas are being used. Therefore, this text can be described as "It is not a strong example of paraphrasing. It just rearranges the original words in a new order".
In Latin, the indirect object will frequently go between the subject and direct object, while in English the indirect object will go between the verb and the direct object.
???what is your question exactly
The answer for the blank is 'i'.
I believe the right answer would be C) monitor.
Monitor can be a noun; "I have many monitors."
Or a verb; "I'll be able to monitor that soon."
