Answer:
D. Advocated adult baptism, and if they had been baptized as children, a second baptism.
Explanation:
Anabaptists, were a christian grouped who had origins that can be traced back to the sixteenth century. They were of the belief that anyone who professes to be a christian must make a conscious decision to follow Christ. As a result of that, they rejected infant baptism. Anyone who converted to their religion would have to be baptized again even if they had been baptized before as infants.
Their system of belief was based on the teachings of Christ's Sermon on the Mount. So, they did not swear oaths, engage in war or even participate in politics.
Well, you have to see how Hamilton has influenced today’s society. Jefferson’s agrarian ideals almost completely became irradiated by the end of the 19th century with the growth of industrialism. Hamilton’s liberal economic practices allowed for industry to flourish in a pro-business economy a post Civil War 19th century America.
The original purpose of dropping atomic bombs were to, instead of sending in troops, drop an atomic bomb on your city of choice and wipe out everyone in a mile's radius. That is the short term effect. But the long term effects include nuclear radiation which poisons people in a much larger radius, while contaminating the environment for an extended period of time.
Hope this helps!
The views of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke regarding the social contract are based on the idea of natural law. Natural law can be described as a universal law that everyone is subject to, regardless of their location. Both Hobbes and Locke also believed that a government was necessary to establish order and keep the peace. This is where their differences end. Starting with the same premise, both philosophers come to very different conclusions about the role of the government in the social contract.
Thomas Hobbes believed that absolute monarchy was the best form of government because humans were violent by nature. It was necessary to maintain order and peace, so people must give up their freedom to live obediently under a ruler who would protect them. According to Hobbes, people do not have the right to rebel against a government who is protecting them, no matter how unjust, because they relinquished their rights in the contract.
John Locke came to a completely different conclusion about the role of government in the contract. The primary difference between the two men is that Locke trusted human beings. He believed that people were naturally reasonable and moral, and would do the right thing. Locke also argued that people are endowed with natural rights of life, liberty, and property. According to him, the sole purpose of government was to protect these rights, and people have the right to break the contract if the government failed to do this. In fact, the people are obligated to break the contract. John Locke's ideas of natural rights was an important influence on Thomas Jefferson when he wrote the Declaration of Independence.
