Answer: what kind of class is this?
Explanation:
The conclusion which comports with the current rights of prisoners held captive as part of the United States War on Terrorism is that the prisoners have rights in humane treatment, medical care and a return to their countries. The right of every prisoner of war is protected by The Third Geneva Convention.
<h3>The Third Geneva Convention</h3>
The protection of the prisoners of war is defined by this convention which defines their rights and sets out the rules of the treatment and release. It is prohibited to perform any unlawful act causing death or endangering the health of the prisoners of war.
#SPJ4
Answer:
While the U.S. Constitution applies to the federal government with the states being subordinate, the Texas Constitution (and all state constitutions) sets in writing what the state government can and cannot do with the counties being subordinate.
While similar to the U.S Constitution, the Texas Constitution has some striking differences, many of which can make it more difficult to file constitutionally based lawsuits under Texas law. One of the most striking differences between the Texas and U.S. Constitutions is length. The U.S. Constitution is intentionally brief and vague, which allows the federal government to broadly interpret it. The Texas Constitution was written leaving little room for interpretation to ensure it cannot be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with the constitution’s ideals.
The Texas Constitution gets its length from going into great detail. While the Texas Constitution grants Texans similar rights to the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution is much more specific regarding exactly when these rights are infringed upon. While it may seem like this specificity would make legal matters cut and dry, in practice it can greatly complicate things.
Explanation:
Make sure to re-word it or use spinbot.com so you don't get caught plagiarizing
