1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SSSSS [86.1K]
3 years ago
7

Who were the untouchables in the Indian caste system?

History
2 answers:
BigorU [14]3 years ago
8 0

Many castes have been called untouchable, which subscribes to the social rule  that commands marriage exclusively within the caste community. Traditionally, the groups characterized as untouchable were people who worked on polluting activities, for example: (1) taking the life of animals for a living, for example, fishermen, (2) killing or disposing of dead cattle for a living, (3) practicing activities that included contact with emissions of the human body, such as feces, urine, sweat, and spittle such as sweepers and washer men, and (4) eating the flesh of cattle or of domestic pigs and chicken, a category into which many  indigenous tribes of India fell.

In general, the name was given to members of low-caste Hindu groups and people outside the caste system. The use of the term and the social disabilities associated with it were declared illegal in India in 1949 and Pakistan in 1953.  


Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
4 0
Untouchables were the people in society who were deemed as less than human. They were the people that cleaned up the streets, took care of dead bodies... They had to do what no one else in society wanted to do pretty much.
You might be interested in
20 POINTS! FIRST TO ANSWER ***CORRECTLY*** GETS BRAINLIEST!
alexgriva [62]

Answer:

 Wellness in Africa to win! Entries close: 15 April



Indo-Aryan migrations

Language

Download PDF

Watch

Edit

The Indo-Aryan migrations[note 1] were the migrations into the Indian subcontinent of Indo-Aryan peoples, an ethnolinguistic group that spoke Indo-Aryan languages, the predominant languages of today's North India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Indo-Aryan population movements into the region and Anatolia (ancient Mitanni) from Central Asia are considered to have started after 2000 BCE, as a slow diffusion during the Late Harappan period, which led to a language shift in the northern Indian subcontinent. The Iranian languages were brought into the Iranian plateau by the Iranians, who were closely related to the Indo-Aryans.

The Proto-Indo-Iranian culture, which gave rise to the Indo-Aryans and Iranians, developed on the Central Asian steppes north of the Caspian Sea as the Sintashta culture (2200[2][3][4]–1800 BCE)[5][6][7][8] in present-day Russia and Kazakhstan, and developed further as the Andronovo culture (2000–900 BCE),[9] around the Aral Sea.

The Indo-Aryans split off around 2000 BCE to 1600 BCE from the Iranians,[10] and migrated southwards to the Bactria-Margiana Culture, from which they borrowed their distinctive religious beliefs and practices. From the BMAC, the Indo-Aryans migrated into Anatolia and, possibly in multiple waves, the Punjab (northern Pakistan and India), while the Iranians, starting ca. 800 BCE, moved into Iran, both bringing with them the Indo-Iranian languages.

Migration by an Indo-European people was first hypothesized in the late 18th century, following the discovery of the Indo-European language family, when similarities between western and Indian languages had been noted. Given these similarities, a single source or origin was proposed, which was diffused by migrations from some original homeland

Explanation:

am i right

7 0
3 years ago
According to
stiv31 [10]

Answer:

yes idjdjdhdbsvshsbsbsbsbsbbsbsbs

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the book How the Other Half Lives, Jacob Riis sought to expose the terrible living conditions experienced by
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
Number 1 is the right answer:)
4 0
3 years ago
Anthony lives in Country B. In Country B, the president was elected in 1995. There have been elections every few years, but the
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

in parliament democracy

8 0
2 years ago
Overall, Americans are more likely to hold mixed political views rather than support one party. True or False?
bezimeni [28]

Answer:Explanation:

True. Only 1/3 belong to a party. Over 1/2 of America holds mixed political views

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Short term effects of the 24th amendment
    15·1 answer
  • I support the Republican Party- they are trying to help take our country back!
    12·1 answer
  • 1 . hezekiah prince of nebuchadnezzar's eunuchs 2 . ashpenaz daniel's babylonian name 3 . abed-nego godly king from whom daniel
    13·1 answer
  • Japanese history, from the 1950s on was very connected to a focus on ___________ growth.
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following foreign policy situations did Obama inherit when he took over the US presidency?
    11·2 answers
  • In this passage what does Wollstonecraft suggest must happen to change the status of women in society
    14·2 answers
  • What concepts/thoughts were learned about the Texas Revolution (one to three words maximum per concept).
    6·2 answers
  • Which right or freedom allows people to participate
    6·1 answer
  • EXPLAIN in 4-8 sentences how the US Constitution in a way fixed the problems with the Articles of Confederation, and how the US
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Of the different ways that early empires expanded and maintained power, which empires do you think were most successful? Were
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!