The answer to this question is <span> anomie; collective conscience.
According to emile durkheim, an action could only be considered as crime if the majority of people in a society agree that the action is unacceptable.
So, the cause of it usually either because the situation forced the perpetrator to do it, or because the perpetrator felt that he/she does not belong to the society, so he/she wouldn't be bound by the rules</span>
<span>One of the major advantages of judges being appointed is that they are usually chosen on their basis of how well they have done their jobs, are they fair, have they done exceptional work in deciding their cases judgements. One of the disadvantages is that sometimes bad judges can slip thru the cracks when appointed that may not have the right moral compass to judge cases fairly. As such some judges can also be swayed to look the otherway on issues that they strongly oppose that their constituents may favor.</span>
Theres no selections mabye try getting the full problem?
