1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenaWriter [7]
3 years ago
11

Does the law say anything about a search warrant for investigative journalists

Law
1 answer:
umka21 [38]3 years ago
8 0
Well no but this my help Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Journalists rely on source protection to gather and reveal information in the public interest from confidential sources. Such sources may require anonymity to protect them from physical, economic or professional reprisals in response to their revelations.
You might be interested in
The literature indicates females are delinquent for different reasons than males. A socialization view is based on the idea that
VARVARA [1.3K]
I don’t know the reading so what I can answer is that is true because if you grow up being bullied all of your life that can turn you into the same person that bullied you and females do have different pressures by society and men
3 0
4 years ago
What are 6 constutional right offenders have​
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

IDK

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me with this lol.
Serga [27]

Answer:Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How is the United States not the original Apartheid state?.
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

It was a specific set of racist policies created by the ruling white minority of South Africa. One can make a claim that something similar took place in the USA

Explanation:

can you please answer's my recent questions <3

8 0
2 years ago
Someone please help me with this question!!!!
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

the others are already answered

Explanation:

For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which illustrates the proper outline for a judge's opinion on a case?
    11·1 answer
  • ______ option can only be exercised on the expiration date.
    5·1 answer
  • In a civil case which phrase best describes the threshold of guilt
    14·1 answer
  • If you're convicted of DUI a second or subsequent time,
    13·2 answers
  • For which offense are juveniles most likely to be arrested?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best reflects the views of an Anti-Federalist?
    13·2 answers
  • What planning went into where fire departments were located?
    5·1 answer
  • Opinions and ideas are usually stronger arguments than the Constitution and previous Supreme Court decisions.
    12·2 answers
  • How does the constitution promote the value of independence for the Supreme Court?
    13·1 answer
  • In which situation would you be more likely to use the Rogerian model than the Toulmin model?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!