The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, passed in 1967, cited the frequent practice of using "arbitrary age limits" to make staffing decisions. The ADEA was first amended in 1986 and again 199q with the older workers benefit protection act.
Well this is mainly a subjective question. the answer is supposed to come from what you believe but personally I disagree.
by balancing out the other two parties
<span>There are many valid reasons for this, but a need for and preventing corruption/dictatorship seem the best reason for me. </span><span>It's a lot of power for one person, and in 8 years, a lot of good (but also a lot of damage) can be done. 8 years is enough for a good president to leave his mark on our country. Going beyond that point, especially with lifetime appointments like Article III judges, potentially lets a president perpetuate his power for a generation</span>