Answer:
Consequential validity
Explanation:
Consequential validity is related to the positive and negative consequences of a particular test in society. The consequential validity is related to the positive attributes of a person such as improvement in a student motivation level and learning that indicated that all students have equal class content. The standardized test has been positive as well as negative consequences. This test has some negative consequences such as to relocate the state fund and the teaching students have to pass the test.
This validity has two procedure:
- To make sure about the test that the test has been administered correctly and thoroughly.
- To find out the consequences and potential of applied testing.
-
profession and training are interrelated terms
without training or knowing the basic knowledge of sth we can't understand anything. this goes same with profession. if we don't have knowledge or training regarding the occupation or profession we want to pursue then we cannot achieve it. so that is why profession and training are very interealted
the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.
Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition. When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.
C. unsanitary conditions were dangerous because people could be prone to sickness and diseases and few windows made the tenements too hot to live in.
Answer:
The use of strategies, such as flattery, by which people seek to gain another's favor is known as <u>ingratiation</u>.
Explanation:
One of the common techniques to favor consent is ingratiating, it is about trying to please people to increase condescension, in other words, ingratiating, essentially involves efforts by the agent of influence to increase their attractiveness to the object of influence, of so that the latter is later more willing / susceptible to the requirements / requests. This process is closely related to the issue of handling impressions or self-presentation, a relevant issue in different areas of interpersonal behavior.
