If there is information in the structure of the space of situations in which an argument's premises are true which shows that th
e premises are true and the conclusion is false in 2/3 of the space, and the argument's premises are true, is it rational to believe that the negation of the conclusion is true?
Following the deductive thinking logic, an argument can have true premises (be valid) and can have a false conclusion. It's one <u>possibility</u> of many. However, if an argument says that all of its premises are true then, consequently, the conclusion <u>must</u> be true as well.
If the government intervenes and corrects the externality in the situation described above, the expectations are
the output of the paper mills to increase. The price of paper from the mills to decrease. Production of the hydroelectric power plants to decrease. production in the paper mills to decrease.
