i had to delete this for a good reason but here is my answer that i got correct on edge 2020
The interview with Miep Gies was effective because it achieved the reporter's and Gies's purpose. I think the interview effectively helped them achieve both purposes
Answer:
The answer is "in question 1, option a and in question 2, option d".
Explanation:
In question 1:
:
: :
: 
In question 2:
: : 
Option (b) and (f)i.e, Project Constellation and ExoMars have been deferred due to a shortage of funds and The amount of money spent on NASA is much less than the amount of money spent on the Department of Defense.
<h3>What Is NASA?</h3>
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is known as NASA. The United States government's NASA agency is in charge of all air and space-related science and technology. With the Soviet satellite Sputnik's launch in 1957, the Space Age officially began.
On October 1st, 1958, NASA began operations. The organization was established to coordinate American space exploration and aviation research.
According to the study, the federal government spends 40 times less on NASA than on the Department of Defense. As a result, the initial response is correct. The second response is likewise accurate because it was stated clearly in the article. The other options are also illogical because neither Russia nor anybody else ever claimed that NASA or the government of Defense were less significant than one another.
Therefore, option(b)and(f) are the two claims.
To know more about NASA refer to: brainly.com/question/20763143
#SPJ10
Answer:
Moreover, Besides, Also, Furthermore.
Explanation:
All of these words above express addition, you can add more information after them, the one you used is more suitable to show contrast between two different things. The two uses that you mentioned are both good, so <em>on the other hand </em>is not the correct option here, if you use <em>on the other hand</em> what comes next should be a <u>negative effec</u>t of the use of medical marijuana.
Answer:
Each text presents the same topic using a different tone and point of view