1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weqwewe [10]
4 years ago
13

Why was control of Mississippi vital to the Western settlers

History
1 answer:
jenyasd209 [6]4 years ago
8 0
The control of the Mississippi river is truly vital to the Western settlers. It's because this enabled them to do more trading in order to provide more supplies and to boost the economy. It also promoted its own tourism and convenience to the people as it helped them travel.
You might be interested in
Which of the following prehistoric cultures created spear points like the one in the image above?
stich3 [128]
The answer is b I’m for sure
4 0
3 years ago
How did president Jackson support a policy of Indian removal?
-Dominant- [34]
He supported it by simply signing the paper of the Indian Removal Act, this was proposed in late February 1830.
7 0
3 years ago
Rights such as those in the First Amendment fulfill which purpose of government?
Alla [95]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What ended the war of 1812?
Natasha2012 [34]

In June 1812, the United States declared war against Great Britain in reaction to three issues: the British economic blockade of France, the induction of thousands of neutral American seamen into the British Royal Navy against their will, and the British support of hostile Indian tribes along the Great Lakes frontier. A faction of Congress, made up mostly of western and southern congressmen, had been advocating the declaration of war for several years. These “War Hawks,” as they were known, hoped that war with Britain, which was preoccupied with its struggle against Napoleonic France, would result in U.S. territorial gains in Canada and British-protected Florida.


3 0
3 years ago
If you were a Supreme Court Justice how would you have ruled in the case of Kerematsu v United States
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruled that the evacuation order violated by Korematsu was valid, and it was not necessary to address the constitutional racial discrimination issues in this case.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Despite massive protests from the African American and student communities, the Vietnam War continued until the summer of 1979.
    6·1 answer
  • Martin Luther believed that one’s salvation was predestined by God.true or false
    14·2 answers
  • A person who rules in place of a ruler who is either too young or too ill to govern
    5·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Manhattan Project? Group of answer choices To make America the financial capital of the postwar worl
    8·1 answer
  • How did Japanese Americans feel during WWII?
    6·1 answer
  • DESPERATE WILL GIVE BRAINLIST AND THANKS
    13·1 answer
  • Who was Thurgood Marshall? How did he contribute to the civil rights movement?
    13·1 answer
  • Use partisan and caucus in a sentence.
    12·1 answer
  •  What geographic features you see on this physical map
    11·1 answer
  • Georgia <br><br> Reasons for settlement
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!