1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weqwewe [10]
4 years ago
13

Why was control of Mississippi vital to the Western settlers

History
1 answer:
jenyasd209 [6]4 years ago
8 0
The control of the Mississippi river is truly vital to the Western settlers. It's because this enabled them to do more trading in order to provide more supplies and to boost the economy. It also promoted its own tourism and convenience to the people as it helped them travel.
You might be interested in
What happened to the Philippines after its rebellion against annexation failed?
Step2247 [10]
I believe that the answer is D
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which important contribution to Texas did Lawrence Sullivan “Sul” Ross make?
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

For all the K12 students out there:

Question 1 : Texas adopted a new state constitution.

Question 2 : He rebuilt and restored Texas A&M University.

Question 3 : telephone

Question 4 : ending unfair business practices and government corruption

Question 5 : He helped end unfair practices by the railroads.

These are all right cause I took the test :)

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following issues is a benefit of globalization?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

exchange of goods , ecchange of information become faster than before

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which leader was threatened by violence and fled from the South?
Vinvika [58]
Ida B Wells <span>was threatened by violence and fled from the South....</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the pros and cons of partisanship
iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

There are advantages as well as disadvantages of a partnership.

<u>Explanation: </u>

Advantages (pros): <em>Partnership helps in establishing the organisation and in capital investments. </em>Having two or more heads is better than having one head to look after the organisation. <em>In partnership has an opportunity for dividing the income this results in tax savings. </em>

Disadvantages (Cons): <em>If the partners join or leave the organisation this can be costly and must be bared by you</em>. Liability will be the topmost issue found in partnership, in sharing profits and assets. The owner is responsible to bear all the loss occurred. <em>We should share all the details of the organisation and none of the detail is to be hidden.</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What impact did the Napoleonic Wars have on popular culture?
    7·2 answers
  • What are three ways that speaking the same language could unify people?
    10·1 answer
  • Did the colonists commit treason by declaring their independence from Great Britain? Why or
    8·1 answer
  • What is intervention?
    12·2 answers
  • Metropolitan Atlanta’s population was less than 1,000,000 in 1950. Today that population is over 6,000,000 (more than half of th
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement is the best example of a liberal ideological belief?
    14·2 answers
  • What must Odysseus do to die happy? Select all that apply.
    5·1 answer
  • Stephen Douglas believed that:
    10·1 answer
  • What were the effects of the second Great Awakening?
    7·1 answer
  • What are some differences or similarities between the Mesopotamian, Hebrew, and Zoroastrian explanations for creation?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!