Answer:
I would interview Amelia Earhart. I would ask her if she could go back in time, if she would still make the same decisions. I would ask her if she thought she would have as big of an impact, as she did, for womens rights. I would also ask her if she knew what was happening at the moment of disappearance.
I am not saying I would want to talk to Amelia current day, I would want to go back in time and ask her those time-specific questions. I feel like you can get a lot of insight from it regarding confidence. She seems to hold a special place for those dealing with breaking the female boundaries, I would want to let her know that.
Explanation:
Robespierre was a controversial French figure during the French Revolution who became a leader of the revolution and a spokesman for the revolutionary cause. His record is controversial because he sought to create a "virtuous republic" through quick and swift justice, which was essentially the use of execution to rid France of anyone against the revolution that swept France. Many accused Robespierre of being a tyrant or dictatorial and eventually he was executed himself.
<span>The goal of the Dawes Act of 1887 regarding native americans indians was to divide up large amounts of Native lands and allocate it to individual Natives--in order to have the Natives "assimilate" more in the US. </span>
Answer:
OA. It provided for its people during emergency situations.
Explanation:
As given in the excerpt from the book <em>Chronicles of the Incas </em>by Pedro de Cieza de Leon, it is easy to understand that the government takes care of its people during their hard times. It also has no discrimination against the poor or the weak, nor does it differentiate between the rich and the poor, or the lords and the common people.
Equality was the main theme of the Incan government, with everyone required to work hard and supply the food for the storage. The statement <em>"No one who was lazy or tried to live by the work of others was tolerated; everyone had to work"</em> rightly provide proof that everyone was treated equal, where even the lords were made to work on the fields and take <em>"the plow in hand and cultivated the earth, and did other things"</em>. The requirement that anyone who is healthy must work and supply the storehouse, and when he is ill or in need of help, he can get however much he wants from the storehouse. Thus,<u> this system shows that there is no demarcation between the people and everyone was free to get what they need but also required to work in providing for the storehouse. </u>
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
