1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
3 years ago
8

What was the most common negative effect of imperialism on Asian nations?

History
2 answers:
VladimirAG [237]3 years ago
7 0
A prime example was the Opium Wars in China. Hope I could be of help! :)
Zepler [3.9K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:   The correct answer is : The natives lost control of the land and independence. The population dispersed and commercial crops displaced many of the food crops, which caused famine. The natives also died of new diseases for them like smallpox. Due to the rebellions thousands of people died.

You might be interested in
What contributions did Romans make to engineering​
hoa [83]

Answer:

Roman engineers used inverted siphons to move water across a valley if they judged it impractical to build a raised aqueduct. The Roman legions were largely responsible for building the aqueducts. Maintenance was often done by slaves. The Romans were among the first civilizations to harness the power of water.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Image your the judge, how is your role in government different from an elected official?
kondaur [170]

Answer:

because A judge's main role in the government is to apply and or interpret laws while an elected official, say a Senator, creates laws.

Explanation:

Judges are usually appointed while elected officials are voted by the people to be in the chosen position.

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me with my question and id k how to do this please help
dem82 [27]

Answer:

“The White Man’s Burden” presents the conquering of non-white races as white people's selfless moral duty. This conquest, according to the poem, is not for personal or national benefit, but rather for the gain of others—specifically, for the gain of the conquered. The white race will “serve [their] captives’ need” rather than their own, and the white conquerors “seek another’s profit, / And work another’s gain.” Even if they do not recognize their benefit, the non-white races will be brought “(Ah, slowly!) toward the light,” escaping the “loved Egyptian night” in which they idled before their conquest. Yet the non-whites’ positive sentiment for their own “darkness” indicates the extreme difficulty whites will face in seeking to educate the conquered peoples.

By emphasizing the hardships of this "burden," the speaker positions himself as a realist who sees all the difficulties of an imperialist project and the inevitable thanklessness that results. The speaker announces that imperial conquest will “bind your sons to exile” and cause them to “wait in heavy harness” in pursuit of the “savage wars of peace,” indications of the difficulty and tedium of the inevitable war. The “silent, sullen peoples” lifted up from “bondage” will never offer the imperialists any thanks or praise.

By taking the difficulty and thanklessness of imperialism seriously, the speaker establishes his credibility as someone of clear-sighted judgement. This stance of realism offers the speaker’s argument two key things. First, it staves off the retort that the speaker is some idealist blinded by an impossible dream. The speaker’s focus on the difficulty of the task actually has the effect of making that task seem, eventually, achievable, since all the difficulties have already been foreseen. Second, it sets up the speaker (and the European powers the speaker seems connected to) as a kind of stern, realist father figure to America who will offer Americans true respect—“the judgement of your peers” both “cold” and “edged with dear-bought wisdom”—if they fulfill their imperialist task.

Indeed, the poem in many ways appeals to the middle-class virtues of ordinary turn of the 20th century Americans by presenting imperialism as a sober, tedious duty rather than a grand adventure of conquest. Imperialism is a “toil of serf and sweeper,” not a “tawdry rule of kings.” The larger part of “the white man’s burden” is thus an exercise in “patience,” accepting the length and difficulty of the task set for the imperialists. Not a calling to a high heroic destiny, but a crude, almost homely task, imperialism suits the desires of those who imagine themselves honest workers on humanity’s behalf, rather than triumphant conquerors of weaker peoples. Put another way, the poem can be seen as cannily playing to the vanity of America precisely by refusing to play to its vanity. The poem is saying to an America that, in 1899, was feeling itself ready to emerge on the world stage: this is how you can stop being a child and grow up.

While the speaker of “The White Man’s Burden” can be seen as trying to cannily build an argument that will specifically appeal to a certain set of Americans, it also seems possible that the speaker is not being purely cynical. The speaker seems to believe everything he is saying: that imperialism and colonialism is a thankless task, taken up by whites purely out of goodwill for other races (even if those other races lack the ability to see the gift being bestowed upon them), without any ulterior motive of profit, reward, praise, or even gratitude. This enterprise may not even succeed; references to the task’s difficulty far outnumber references to its success. Thus even as the speaker believes it is the white man's duty to engage in conquest, he may also believe that this conquest will fall short of its moral goals. Imperialism, the speaker sincerely believes, is the white man’s gracious sacrifice on behalf of non-whites.

Explanation:

all of that^ is basically a theme of colonialism and imperialism, hope it helps:)

3 0
2 years ago
How did africa change islam
tester [92]
Well they are 2 different places so unless war happened describe what happened between them
5 0
2 years ago
Why did Americans need to use the Mississippi River and New Orleans?
miskamm [114]

Answer: Because New Orleans was a very important trading port. ... The New Orleans was very important for importing and exporting goods;Mississippi River was a major transportation for settlers and good to ship items east.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did workers do when they signed yellow-dog contracts
    12·2 answers
  • Is it important to trade with other countries?should we trade with countries who we do not get along with?
    9·1 answer
  • Where do some historians think the Aryans lived before they arrived in India?
    6·1 answer
  • Who assisted Chinese rebels in overthrowing the Ming dynasty and installing the Qing dynasty?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the conquistadors change America
    13·2 answers
  • Help answer please and it isn't add 23x I tried it and it was wrong please help
    14·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the storming of the bastille?
    7·1 answer
  • Eakins studied ______ and wanted to ensure his works were as accurate and lifelike as possible.
    14·1 answer
  • How did geography influence the development of native american cultures?
    14·1 answer
  • Based on this document, what is ONE way in which these proposals favored the free states,
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!