1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ValentinkaMS [17]
4 years ago
9

What is the primary difference between hard money and soft money

History
2 answers:
Olegator [25]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The answer to the question: What is the primary difference between "hard" and "soft" money, would be: first, that hard money is purposefully money given to support a candidate from a party, while soft money is given to parties for the purpose of building the party and their purposes. The second difference is that hard money is now heavily regulated by the Federal Elections Comission.

Explanation:

The issue of how campaigns, and parties, were able acquire the money to both launch their candidates, and party-related activities outside of campaigning time, became really important after it became evident that the regulations placed on donations from individuals, companies, or any sector, for that matter, through the passage of rules in 1978, were being violated. As such, parties were discovered to be using "soft" money as a means to also finance candidates and the "party activities" which were supposed to be financed by "soft" money but were not supposed to tell the electorate who to vote for, was doing exactly the opposite. As of today, and after 1988, "hard" money and even soft money were regulated, but there is a much stricter control on "hard" money.

Solnce55 [7]4 years ago
3 0
“Soft” money is not as heavily regulated.
You might be interested in
Which law did President Jackson sign in order to support farmers who wanted to expand in the Southeast region of the United Stat
Verizon [17]
The Indian removal act 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was a result of Europe’s settlement of North America?
grandymaker [24]
For Europe, settlement meant alleviating some of the financial and physical stress caused by overpopulation, as well as opening up new avenues for trade. For North America, it meant the systematic murder and eventual removal of Native Americans, as well as the eventual birth of America, the world's most powerful country. 
<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which countries were considered the three major axis powers?
olchik [2.2K]
Germany Japan and Italy were called the axis powers in WWII
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What civilization would most likely be culturally isolated from other civilizations
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

Japan

Explanation:

Japan was an island with no other countries bordering it, and they even adopted a policy stating that they would do no trade or even contact other countries, and no citizen was allowed to leave.

6 0
3 years ago
Como veian los cristianos de occidente a musulmanes y judios
Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

How western Christians viewed Muslims and Jews

Explanation: Your welcome

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to locke the laws put into place by a government must be____
    9·1 answer
  • Who won the Election of 1796?
    8·1 answer
  • Helppppppppppppppppppppppppp
    8·1 answer
  • What are three important features of a culture?
    15·2 answers
  • True or false: Hitler and the Nazis believed that government should not exert control over free markets.
    14·2 answers
  • What events occurred when the Roman soldiers saw that Jesus was already dead?
    9·1 answer
  • THIS IS THE ANSWER, HAVEN'T GOTTEN A GRADE YET BUT IT'S RIGHT FOR SURE
    13·2 answers
  • The Wagner Act was instrumental in... 1 point
    11·1 answer
  • everyone here is so nice so heres like 50 points have fun dudes, but my question is what was the largest dinosaur in history
    12·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from the Louisiana constitution.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!