Based on the level of control that the national government has, the system of government in France must be a Unitary system.
<h3>What happens in a unitary system?</h3>
In a unitary system, the national government maintains absolute power in the governing of the nation. There might exist local governments but these are created by the national government who can also abolish them at any time.
This is the case in France where the French government can create the regions in the nation and also abolish them should they feel like it.
Find out more on unitary governments at brainly.com/question/3558587.
#SPJ1
Both of these are important to emphasize in a textbook chapter, as both of them are fair representations of the role that communist policies had in the Soviet Union.
If we only reported on the achievements in space of the Soviet Union, then we would minimize the damage that certain policies caused. On the other hand, if we only reported on Stalin's Great Terror, then we would be painting a biased and inaccurate picture of the regime. Therefore, it is important to mention both of these events, as well as the many others that defined the Soviet Union during this time period.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
On increasing quantity price will increases
The answer is C. The Byzantines lasted a good bit longer.
Explanation: The Byzantine or Eastern Roman empire lasted until 1453. The empire collapsed due to the emperor Constantinople, while the Roman Empire fell around the date of 476.
Dynastic cycle (traditional Chinese: 朝代循環; simplified Chinese: 朝代循环; pinyin: Cháodài Xúnhuán) is an important political theory in the Chinese history. According to this theory, each dynasty in Chinese history, rises to a political, cultural, and economic peak and then, because of moral corruption, declines, loses the Mandate of Heaven, and falls, only to be replaced by a new dynasty. The cycle then repeats under a surface pattern of repetitive motifs.[1]
It sees a continuity in Chinese history from early times to the present by looking at the succession of empires or dynasties, implying that there is little basic development or change in social or economic structures.[2] John K. Fairbank expressed the doubts of many historians when he wrote that "the concept of the dynastic cycle... has been a major block to the understanding of the fundamental dynamics of Chinese history."[3]
