<span>under president johnson's reconstruction plan, the south was led by: </span><span>wealthy white planters
These planters were strongly opposing the reconstruction plan because they heavily relied on the Slaves' labor force in order to operate the majority of their plantations.</span>
Answer:
D. Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.
Explanation:
Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.
Hope this helps ;)
Answer:
O A. A central government was formed
I believe the answer is :<span>The historian is placing the argument in historical context.
Argument with historical context would tried to explain a certain historical event based on </span>the social, political, religious, and economic conditions that existed during a certain time and place.In the example above, the historian choose to base her argument on religious conditions in the past.
