Answer:
increase assets by $13,000, increase liabilities by $13,000 and have no effect on equity.
Explanation:
Given that
The total cost of purchase of delivery truck = $15,000
Cash paid = $2,000
The accounting equation equals to
Total assets = Total liabilities + owners equity
The remaining amount left would be equal to
= $15,000 - $2,000
= $13,000
So it would increase the assets for $13,000 as the delivery truck is purchased plus there is also an increase in liabilities for $13,000 as it signed a note payable and there is no effect on equity
<span>Belarus and central European Russia had very long growing season, but
they had acidic podzol soils that limit
farm output</span><span>. Three environments influence agriculture in
this region</span><span>, Poor soils, cold temps, forests north of Moscow and St. Petersburg. </span>Soils support
commercial wheat, corn, sugar, beets, meat production.
Answer:
Unitary cost= $118
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Production= 43,000
Direct materials $43.00 per unit
Direct manufacturing labor $8.00 per unit
Variable manufacturing costs $4.00 per unit
Fixed manufacturing costs $63.00 per unit
<u>The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable.</u> The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead.
Unitary cost= 43 + 8 + 4 + 63
Unitary cost= $118
Answer:
d) Contractual non-compliance provisions are broader in scope.
Explanation:
Both common law and civil law were originated in western Europe. Common law comes from medieval England while civil law comes from ancient Roman Empire. Common law is more flexible than civil law, so that allows different interpretations of the law. Since civil law is more rigid, contractual non-compliance provisions must include all possible contingencies and their outcomes.
Answer:
don't launch
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
The payoff matrix for this question is
Launch (in millions) Don't Launch (in millions)
Launch (in millions) $40, $40 $30, $45
Don't Launch (in millions) $45, $30 $50, $50
It can be seen that the best strategy for each firm is not to launch because the payoffs of not launching ($45, $50) is greater than the payoff of launching ($40, $30)
