Answer:
<h2>Regulatory policy</h2>
Answer:
- Cal is from a low-context culture and Medina is from a high-context culture.
Explanation:
As per the given details, it can be inferred that Cal most likely belongs to a low-context culture and Medina belongs to high-context culture. The key reason for this inference is that Cal displays direct and denotative communication while Medina is connotative and conveys her message indirectly and more through gestures, facial expressions, etc. Thus, Cal is unable to infer the actual meaning of her message as he comes from a culture that believes in stating thoughts directly instead of suggesting.
According to the cognitive approach to depression, processing information through the negative schema causes people to become depressed.
What is cognitive approach to depression?
Cognitive approach to depression focuses on people's beliefs and not their behavior, it belief that Depression usually comes from the systematic negative bias that do occur from thinking processes.
In this case, cognitive approach to depression, is processing information through the negative schema.
Learn more about depression at:
brainly.com/question/25960579
#SPJ1
Explanation:
country is known for its palm oil production
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
