The answer is “life-span”. The Life Span Approach studies the
progress of individuals which occurs from birth to demise. Development is a difficult
procedure, which comprises of fading and demise. This approach cautiously examines
the progress of individuals with high opinion to evolving stages.
Answer:
Explanation:
The testimony by the bank employee that the photo accurately portrays the scene of the crime is only required because the photo is only being used as “demonstrative evidence,” and demonstrative evidence only needs to be authenticated to be admissible. Evidence is “authenticated” if there is testimony asserting that the evidence is what the proponent claims it to be.
Number 1 is not necessary because the photo is not being used as original evidence that played an actual role in the robbery itself; for example, a gun used by the robber, which would require a “chain of custody” type of authentication to be admissible.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
Answer: It could be Islam.
Explanation:
Usually, when the phrase "religion of peace" is said, the conversation is always around Islam. Peace is greatly associated with Islam. Even when Muslims greet each other, they say "asalamu alaykom," which means "peace be upon you."
As for the dressing plainly portion, Muslims are supposed to dress modestly. This means that they are supposed to avoid tight or revealing clothing.
Answer:
1000 years
Explanation:
The timeline provided shows the major vents in the history of Ancient Egypt. We can see that Upper and Lower Egypt have unified in 3100 B.C. The ruler who unified the lower and upper Egypt was Menes, who also started the First Dynasty of Egypt.
By the timeline, Middle Kingdom started in 2100 B.C<u>.</u> This period is started with the reunification of Egypt after the Old Kingdom and the age during which Egypt wasn’t as powerful. Mentuhotep II is the one who reunited Egypt and the first pharaoh of the Middle Kingdom.
<u>We can therefore conclude that the Middle Kingdom started 1000 years after the first unification of Egypt.</u>