Answer: I would say that it can be a an example of counterculture since it shows different points of view according to different cultural standards.
Explanation:
Scholars such as Joanne Martin and Caren Siehl, deem counterculture and cultural development as "a balancing act, [that] some core values of a counterculture should present a direct challenge to the core values of a dominant culture". Therefore, a prevalent culture and a counterculture should coexist in an uneasy symbiosis, holding opposite positions on valuable issues that are essentially important to each of them. According to this theory, a counterculture can contribute a plethora of useful functions for the prevalent culture, such as "articulating the foundations between appropriate and inappropriate behavior and providing a safe haven for the development of innovative ideas".
The ingredients of discontent seemed lacking — at least on the surface. The colonies were not in a state of economic crisis; on the contrary, they were relatively prosperous. Unlike the Irish, no groups of American citizens were clamoring for freedom from England based on national identity. KING GEORGE III was not particularly despotic — surely not to the degree his predecessors of the previous century had been.
Answer:
Flow
Explanation:
All people want to be happy at work. This is not because we all spend significant time at work. The meaning of it for all was different for all people. If someone loves their work they have to be en-ganged in work and get absorbed in the work. In this process, the awareness and action merge.
When a person becomes one of the optimal performance related to physical and cognitive. The en-ganged work fuels the professional work and contributes to the work of growth and the organization. Paolo was experiencing the flow in his work.
THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT WILL DIVIDE AND RULE LIKE IT DID TO MANY COUNTRIES BECAUSE THE COUNTRY PEOPLE ARE REALLY TIED UP WITH EACH OTHER.....
Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.