1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naddika [18.5K]
3 years ago
7

What common challenge did the spread of Christianity and the spread of non- Italians in the empire pose for the survival of Roma

n Empire?
History
1 answer:
Aleks [24]3 years ago
4 0

The spread of Christianity and the spread of non-Italians in the Roman Empire posed big challenge for the future existence of it. The reason for this was that both of these trends had one very powerful common thing, destroying the core of the Roman Empire, in political, ethic, and religious manner. The Christianity was quickly coming on top of the ancient Roman religion, which was the basis of the society, and once it was pushed on the margins and eventually in the past, it created much different social structure in Rome. The ethnic composition of the empire was too rapidly changing, with more and more non-Italians being part of it, and they started to greatly outnumber the Italians. That resulted in lesser loyalty to the empire, as the non-Italians didn't really saw the Roman rulers as the Italians did, but they were seeing as invaders and suppressors. Eventually this resulted in weakening the empire from the inside, which was one of the prime reasons why it crumbled.

You might be interested in
How deomocratic was colonial american society? Why was it apparently becoming less equal?
Kruka [31]
By today's standards this period in the US wasn't very democratic, since minorities and women and poor people could not vote. It became less equal because of wealth disparities. 
8 0
3 years ago
What do the governments of Mexico and Denmark have in common?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

The United States of Mexico is a federal presidential republic. The Constitution of 1917 is in force with numerous amendments. Executive power belongs to the president, who is the head of state and government. The President forms the cabinet, appoints and removes ministers, the Attorney General (with the approval of the Senate), members of the Supreme Court (with the approval of the Senate) and other senior public servants. The President determines domestic and foreign policy, has legislative initiative and veto power, establishes diplomatic relations and concludes international treaties. The president is elected by the people on the basis of universal, direct, secret ballot, without the right to re-election. Legislative power belongs to the bicameral National Congress. The principles of public administration in accordance with the 1917 Constitution meet the criteria for representative liberal democracy.

Denmark is a constitutional monarchy. The constitution was adopted in 1849; amendments were made in 1915 and 1953, when a unicameral parliament was created and women were allowed to become head of state. The head of state is the king, who exercises legislative power together with a unicameral parliament. The highest legislative body is Folketing. Executive power belongs to the monarch and is carried out on his behalf by the government. The government is appointed by the Prime Minister, approved by Folketing and is accountable to him.

Thus, the similarity is the fact that in Mexico the president and in Denmark the king determine domestic and foreign policy. However, the difference is obvious, primarily consisting in the very form of government - the republic and the monarchy, respectively, with all the further differences that follow from this.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The following question refers to a hypothetical situation
Korolek [52]

Answer:

 

Answer

The court may decide to make Augustus Tritch liable for the millions of dollars that Frederick Von Wagner lost out on. Tritch may have to work towards repaying this debt. The court may also decide to pursue a new law that makes this activity illegal and stop further cases from taking place.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the articles of confederation, the was signed in 1783, officially ending the revolutionary War.
Helen [10]
The 1783 Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War.
I hope that is what you're looking for.
8 0
3 years ago
Where was President Lincoln’s body being transferred to after his assasination
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

wasn't he transported back to the White House?

Unless I remember so incorrectly.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were seven precedents established by Washington during his presidency
    5·1 answer
  • Who was responsible for leading an expedition across the Rockies that included women?
    5·2 answers
  • How Seyyid Said contributed towards the development of international trade along the Kenyan coast​
    6·1 answer
  • What is the importance of the "due process"<br> clause in the Fourteenth Amendment?
    14·1 answer
  • What happened to north korea after the korean war?
    10·1 answer
  • We're was the first center of agriculture?
    12·1 answer
  • (100 points!!!) The 1970s saw a growth in the conservative movement in politics and society. How did this
    11·2 answers
  • Why was having the model of DNA so important?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the name of the musical group that released the song ""confidential"" in 1993.
    12·1 answer
  • During the 7 Years War, the British
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!