The Magna Carta constituted a fundamental guarantee of rights and privileges that parliament could not take away
The Bill of Rights was responsible for laying down the principles of parliamentary supremacy
Answer:
constitutional right is diffrent I think
2) <span>The Anti-federalists demanded more written protection than the Federalists did for individual rights.
In order to get 9/13 states to ratify the Constitution, the Federalists had to appease the Anti-Federalists, who were concerned that a strong national government would take away the people's rights.
Note: Anti-Federalists supported the Articles of Confederation more, as the power rested in the state governments.
3) </span><span>Therefore, each branch of the central government will have the power to check the power of the other branches.
This is the only correct answer as the concern at that time was that the national government would have too much power.
4) </span><span>refer to people electing leaders to make government decisions
This is the only answer that makes sense.
A representative democracy is one in which the people elect representatives to make decisions for them.</span>
Natural rights to life,liberty and property
<span>Petroleum
Hope it helps!</span>
