Answer:
Reynolds v Sims and Baker v Carr, I think.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
-ROsemaryAndStars
Narrowing down choices until one arrives at only two options is an example of "<em><u>ideological polarization</u></em>
<em><u>ideological polarizationbipartisanship."</u></em>
<em><u>Ideological polarization bipartisanship</u></em> is a type of ideology in which individuals have various divergent beliefs on ideological issues.
However, to pick the right or favorable options, one narrowed these several divergent beliefs to two options and their find compromise.
The electorates usually use the ideological polarization bipartisanship to choose the candidates to vote for.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "<em><u>ideological polarization bipartisanship."</u></em>
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24874035
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Because I think you determine the relationship between price and quantity
Answer:
In what is sometimes referred to as the "Revolution of 1800", Vice President Thomas Jefferson of the Democratic-Republican Party defeated incumbent President John Adams of the Federalist Party. The election was a political realignment that ushered in a generation of Democratic-Republican leadership.
Explanation:
<span>Orbit changes, tilt on axis. Hope this helps!</span>
