Carl Vinson was very supportive of the US Navy. The first option choice is false, other branches of the US military never lost their funding because of the US Navy. The second choice is kind of true because better ships were built that required fewer people but that wasn't really the major impact. The third answer choice is partially true because Carl Vinson did double the size of the US Navy but other countries still were a threat to the US so this point is false. The last answer choice is true because Carl Vinson's work in naval expansion helped defend Pearl Harbor when it was attacked. The major impact was the last choice. Therefore, the answer is the last choice.
In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.
1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.
2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.
3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.
4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed. Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.
Answer:
the answer is D. It took over private property and nationalized production,
<u><em>Evidence for the answer:</em></u>
- Bolshevik Economy It was essentially a mixed economy – major companies and industries would remain in private hands but under state control. Bourgeois managers and experts would retain their roles in industries, factories, and manufacturing.
2. Bolshevik Period: During this period the Bolsheviks attempted to administrate Russia's economy purely by decree, a policy of the War Communism. Farmers and factory workers were ordered to produce, and food and goods were seized and issued by decree.
3.Bolshevik Ideology: The ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) was Marxism–Leninism, an ideology of a centralized command economy with a vanguardist one-party state to realize the dictatorship of the proletariat.
Nixon aides responded to the siege mentality in the White House by: <span>Wiretapping the FBI's telephones
Siege mentality refers to a mental conditioning that believe someone in our group will be hostile toward us. The FBI's telephone wiretapping is conducted to find out potential white house members that they they're hostile to him.</span>
I don’t know why, he was just a bad king.