If a company spent that much on internet advertising and increased it by 17%, the new amount spent would be $12.87 million.
<h3>How much did the company spend on advertising?</h3>
The amount spent can be calculated as:
= Amount x ( 1 + increase in advertising)
Solving gives:
= 11 million x ( 1 + 17%)
= 11 x 1.17
= $12.87 million
Find out more on advertising expenses at brainly.com/question/24967768.
Answer:
(receive higher wages that reflect an increase in their value of marginal product.)
Answer:
Part a
Contribution Margin = 29.95% (2 d.p)
Part b
Billing Company
CVP Income for as at September 2017
Total Per Unit
$ $
Sales 295704 444
Less Variable Costs (138084) (311)
Contribution 157620 133
Fixed Costs (59850) 89.86
Net Income 97770 43.14
Part c
Billing`s break even point is 450 units
Part d
Billing Company
CVP Income for as at September 2017 - Break Even Point
Total Per Unit
$ $
Sales 199800 444
Less Variable Costs (139950) (311)
Contribution 59850 133
Fixed Costs (59850) 133
Net Income 0 0
Explanation:
Part a
Contribution Margin = Contribution/Sales × 100
Therefore contribution margin is ($444-$311)/$444 * 100 = 29.95% (2 d.p)
Part b
Sales - Variable Cost = Contribution
Net Income = Contribution - Total Fixed Costs
Part c
Break Even Point is when Billings neither makers a profit or loss.
Break Even Point ( Units) = Total Fixed Cost/Contribution per unit
Therefore Break Even Point (Units) = $59850/$133 = 450 units
Part d
The total and unit CVP should neither reflect a profit or loss at a capacity of 450 units as this is the break even point. In this case profit = nill
Answer:
$140,000 and $195,000
Explanation:
The computations are shown below:
Accounting cost would be
= Jill salary + material and other labor costs + Insurance and mortgage payment
= $40,000 + $80,000 + $20,000
= $140,000
The economic cost would be
= Accounting cost + investment left + loss in salary + loss in rent
= $140,000 + $5,000 + $30,000 + $20,000
= $195,000
The loss in salary would be
= $70,000 - $40,000
= $30,000
The loss in rent would be
= $40,000 - $20,000
= $20,000
Answer:
Yes, Rawls could collect.
Explanation:
It is possible that Rawls collects damages due to negligence. This is due to the fact that the main cause of the accident was not substantiated by the Progressive Northern Insurance Company. The company claimed that the accident could have been caused by a series of events and the company was also not certain about the main cause of the accident.
