Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Arbitration and mediation are two alternative ways of resolving legal conflicts, that is, they are alternatives to judicial litigation.
Thus, arbitration involves the selection of an impartial third party (similar to a judge), who will decide through an award who of the parties is right, basing his decision on law, morals, ethics or common sense.
For its part, mediation involves a negotiation between the parties, assisted by a third party, the mediator, who will seek to reach an agreement.
Both alternatives imply that a lawsuit is not initiated, which in itself entails a notable economic and time saving for the parties in conflict.
I believe it's D. Freedom from car owner responsibilities. Mass transit or public transit enable to carry a bigger number of persons in one way transport. Thus, it helps the economy to grow at the same time, it saves energy since in just 1 transport a lot of people can already ride on it. Plus, it gives flexible door to door services
The goal of recruitment is to acquire a pool of candidates massive sufficient to include some talented prospects. True
A purpose is an objective or goal that someone is making an attempt to attain or achieve. The goal is likewise the cease point of a race or something that a participant is trying to put an item into as a part of a game. purpose has other senses as a noun. A goal is an intention or objective that you work toward with attempt and determination.
Lifestyle goals are what we need to obtain, and they may be a lot more meaningful than simply 'what we need to accomplish to live to tell the tale. not like everyday routines or quick-time period targets, they drive our behaviors over the long term.
The definition of a goal is something you aspire to do or wish to do or an aim can refer to scoring a point in certain sporting events. An instance of aim is you decide which you need to get out of debt. An example of aim is whilst you get the p.c. into the opposing crew's net in hockey.
Learn more about goal here: brainly.com/question/1512442
#SPJ4
Answer:
he was discriminated solely based on his sexual orientation.
Explanation:
The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stated that all employers in united states are prohibited to discriminate their employees based on race, religion, gender, national origin, and sexual orientation.
You do not need to be married for your sexual orientation to be acknowledged by the The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 . You just need to proof that any of the factors above are the reason why you're discriminated against.
In Qiang case, he could tried to find witness by talking to other employees or find a recorded email/messages that indicates his boss mistreatment toward him. If there are enough employees who came out as witnesses, he could build a strong enough case to gain support in the court.
Answer: Gwen should report a $3,000 long-term capital gain in her income tax return.
In this question the price paid by Gwen’s mother for the shares is irrelevant because of her death.
The stock’s fair market value ($20) when Gwen inherited the shares (21st October 2015) is Gwen stepped up value.
Gwen’s gain from selling the shares is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b8de/5b8de4ff9be784e97cdb6dd4f091fcbf2e491262" alt="Gain / (Loss) = (Selling Price per share - Stepped up value per share) * Number of shares"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ee6b/2ee6b79974b1822f06b79ce23228eb46271e63b1" alt="Gain = (50 - 20) *100"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d682/1d682eb1142740cfbec996c3a03178bb537384c1" alt="Gain = $3,000"
Gwen inherited the shares on (21st October 2015) and held the shares until (3rd july 2017), so she held the shares for more than one year after inheriting it. So, she will report a long-term capital gain on her income tax return.