A
Hope this helps and I don’t know how to explain but hope it helps
Answer:
Texas shared the position of other slave states regarding the future of new territories and new states. It wanted the expansion of slavery. Southern states advocated a popular sovereignty solution, that is, new states to be admitted to the Union should choose by themselves. The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was a political compromise. Nevertheless, Texas had important objections. In a speech in the Senate delivered on February 15, 1854, Texan leader Sam Houston lists two important obstacles: Nebraska had a too small population in order to sustain organization , and Kansas was a land with very few white settlers and entirely occupied by Native tribes.
Explanation:
I honestly have no idea on the answer Anyway thanks for the points
<span>It lasted for 7 years. Americans at the time ascribed the reason for the frenzy essentially to household political clashes. Some censured Jackson for declining to restore the contract of the Bank, bringing about the withdrawal of government reserves from the bank. Martin Van Buren, who progressed toward becoming president in March 1837, was to a great extent reprimanded for the frenzy despite the fact that his initiation went into the frenzy by just five weeks. Van Buren's refusal to utilize government intercession to deliver the emergency as indicated by his adversaries contributed further to the hardship and term of the dejection that took after the frenzy. Jacksonian Democrats, then again, faulted the National Bank, both in subsidizing uncontrolled hypothesis and in presenting inflationary paper cash. Current market analysts, for the most part, see Van Buren's deregulatory financial strategy as effective in the long haul for its significance in renewing banks after the frenzy</span>
Answer:
World War Two had been extraordinarily costly for Britain and her empire, and in 1945 the country was exhausted and devastated. Aerial bombardment had destroyed many British cities, and there were major shortages of goods and labour for the rebuilding of the country.
World War II also marked the beginning of trends that took decades to fully develop, including technological disruption, global economic integration and digital communication. More broadly, the wartime home front put a premium on something that's even more crucial today: innovation.When Britain emerged victorious from the Second World War, the Labour Party under Clement Attlee came to power and created a comprehensive welfare state, with the establishment of the National Health Service giving free healthcare to all British citizens, and other reforms to benefits.
The aftermath of World War II was the beginning of a new era for all countries involved, defined by the decline of all European colonial empires and simultaneous rise of two superpowers: the Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States (US).
Explanation:
