Answer:
To educate the natives
Explanation:
(you spelt Acorrding wrong)
You were very close though!!!
I hope this helps, comment if you need me, or any more information! Have an amazing day!!!
Answer:
- Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.
Explanation"
The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory. The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu. (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.") He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.
Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall. The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.
As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power." Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:
- Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
- The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
- The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
- The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
To be anle to learn and know how to interact with people.
the answer is 1. The map with the whole country shows the distribution of gold,coal and oil minerals and the other map shows the expansion of the USA, clearly due to the riches found in these areas,as most of them, are located in the West.
2. The US gained the wealth the under the soil, gold, oil and coal, mainly gold and oil.
The United States shouldn't have declared war against Mexico because it was its land and though not fully explored and populated the regionhad also Native American nations, an alternative buy be to buy or get agreements to explore the regions. A second reason is that it is a clearly example of a stronger nation preying on a weaker one, an atittude which many countries do not accept.
Counterargument: It was their right to keep their state and not invade and declare war because of land.
Even though some people think that it was their right to keep the land, one could argue that caudillo-like states, as in South America, could emerge and an elite would totally dominate the poorer on the exploration of the weath.
can i get brainliest i already know the answer hope this helps
what are you trying to say here exactly
