Answer:
Nathan's contention is wrong.
Explanation:
Storage of money at home involves the opportunity cost of losing out on income that would've been generated had the same money been invested elsewhere or deposited with a bank.
Secondly, money stored at home is vulnerable to theft and other forms of risks.
Thirdly, stored money at home does not contribute to any economic benefit since such money is out of circular flow of money in the economy. So it yields no return.
Thus, Nathan's contention of stored money at home being costless is wrong.
Answer:
Zully most likely has a manufacturing franchise
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Zully most likely has a manufacturing franchise. This is a franchising agreement in which the franchiser gives a manufacturer the right to produce and sell their products while also using their name and brand. Which is exactly what Zully is doing by selling Ford Vehicles.
In the 1930s Canada decided to raise taxes on goods imported in the United States in retaliation for the high tariffs that were created by the Hawley-Smoot Tariff. The Hawley-Smoot Tariff raised tariffs on nearly 20,000 imported goods to the United States to extremely high levels. This policy was put in place in an effort to protect American jobs following the Great Depression, but instead closed the U.S. economy off to the global market most likely hurting the American economy further.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
