Answer:
C. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence
Explanation:
Spencer will win the lawsuit and Sally is liable for negligence.
This is because, Sally was the person originally hired to do the roofing job.
She hired other workers to help her with the job, so she's liable to their actions and inactions.
Sally is operating under a working agreement (contract) and has already charged a fee of $10,000 so any punitive damages would be her responsibility.
Spencer was moving around and Glen threw some roofing shingles without any word of warning to people that might be in harm's way. So for Glenn's actions, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Answer:
<u>January 1, 2017</u>
Debit: Accounts Receivable $2800
Credit: Deferred Revenue[Wiring Base] - $1120
Credit: Deferred Revenue[Shelving Unit] - $1680
Narration: Contract Detail and invoicing of the client.
<u>February 5, 2017</u>
Debit Deferred Revenue[Wiring Base] - $1120
Credit Revenue Account - [Wiring Base] - $1120
Narration: Revenue recognition of Wiring Base delivered to customer
<u>February 25, 2017</u>
Debit Deferred Revenue[Shelving Unit]- $1680
Credit Revenue Account - [Shelving Unit] - $1680
Narration: Revenue recognition of Shelf delivered to customer
<u>February 25, 2017</u>
Debit: Bank - $2800
Credit: Accounts Receivable - $2800
Narration: Payment received in settlement of contract fully delivered
Explanation:
The question is an example of a Performance Contract.
A Performance Contract is an agreement with a customer by a vendor to discharge a service or provide goods that are distinct from each other. The accounting for this obligations will therefore be recorded and recognized separately.
It is also important to note that the services or goods must be separately identifiable and the customer must be able to derive from each goods on individually or jointly.
The rule is to
- Recognize the contract and invoice amount with the customer as Deferred Income.
- Identify the distinct obligations and services to be provided.
- Identify the transaction amount for each service or good.
- As each obligation is met, the revenue is finally recognized and transferred from Deferred income.
Answer:
Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.
Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.
Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.
In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.
Answer: see affixed, a document containing the solution
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Because the less product means less sales and less happy people. Hope this helps.