I'd choose C.) and here is why. If I asked someone for directions to a hotel they are going to describe the roads and buildings to me. They might say it is built in an embankment then I know to look for a hotel in an embankment. If this is wrong please let me know so I can research more on the subject.
Explanation:
Hi there!
Given;
one angle (let be x)= 141°
Then;
141° + angle 3 = 180°. {being linear pair}
angle 3 = 180°-141°
angle 3 = 39°
Therefore, angle 3 is 39°.
Now; angle 3 = angle 4 = 39° {alternate angles are equal}
Therefore, the measure of angle 4 is 39°.
<u>Hope</u><u> it</u><u> helps</u><u>!</u>
Answer:
Well if there is lines through the map that's a topographical, but if it's just colors then it's a special purpose
Answer:
here you go :)
Explanation:
Korean and Japanese share a similar system of proximal and distal demonstrative pronouns. They are both topic-prominent, null-subject languages. Both languages extensively utilize turning nouns into verbs via the "to do" helper verbs. They both lack a compulsory distinction of plurality. Korean and the Japonic languages are among the few extant languages in the world with topic markers.
The topic of similarity between the two languages can be politically controversial due to the historical relationship between Japan and Korea, particularly the language policy of Japanese-ruled Korea. Recent population genetic studies reveal that modern Koreans and Japan share as much as a 90 percent overlap in ancestry. The relationship between the languages remains controversial. The Transeurasian hypothesis by Robbeets et al, supported by computational linguistics and archeological evidence, suggests a genealogical link between the Korean and Japanese populations. Korean, Japanese, and Chinese characters are used in Japanese orthography, with the exception of North Korea, where they are used for limited academic, legal, media, stylistic and disambiguation purposes in South Korea today, while eliminated in North Korea.
Japanese and Korean have different native scripts, although a common denominator is the presence of Chinese characters. Japanese doesn't have separate verb forms for attributive verbs, just a predicative verb before a noun. Korean uses distinct conjugations for making attributive verb forms in three tenses. Japanese uses the non-past (present) tense for future events, whereas Korean uses the past tense. The Japanese perfective has two meanings when the stem is an intransitive verb, and it depends on the context.
Some linguists argue that Korean has two tenses (past, present) or four (greater past, past, present, future), and some even argue that Korea has no tense at all but only aspects. The three tense theory is generally accepted but still remains controversial. Japanese has distinct attributiveverb forms for nouns and verbs, but Korean has distinct verb forms to make attributive nouns for verbs. Korean has separate particles for the present perfect and present progressive so their meanings are morphologically different. Japanese's perfective can have two meanings, depending on context; present perfect (e.g. 牾) or the present progressive ( e.g., 走guarded)
