Answer:
Let the Dulcina's collection be 'x'
Let the Tremaine collection be 'x-39'
x + x - 39 =129
2x = 129 +39
2x = 168
x = 168/2
x = 84
Dulcina's collection = x = 84
Tremaine's collection = x - 39 = 84 - 39 = 45
Answer:
859
Step-by-step explanation:
The demand for Coke products varies inversely as the price of Cole products.
Mathematically:
D α 1/p
Where D = demand, p = price of coke product
D = k/p
Where k = constant of proportionality.
Let us find k.
k = D * p
When Demand, D, is 1250, price, p, is $2.75:
=> k = 1250 * 2.75
k = $3437.5
Now, when price, p, is $4, the demand will be:
D = 3437.5/4
D = 859.375 = 859 (rounding to whole number)
The demand for the product is 859 when the price is $4.
Answer: first would be 6 the next would be 12 then the next would be 18 and so on just add 6 for each one and for ten pizzas it would be 6*10 and that equals 60 im sure you get it
This question is in reverse (in two ways):
<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>
<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>
<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>
<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>
<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>
<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>
<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>
<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>
<span>--- </span>
<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>
<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>
<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>
<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>
<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>
<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>
<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>
<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>
<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>
<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>
<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>
<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
The time between customer arrivals is called inter-arrival time. According to Queueing Notation, the inter-arrival time can be model based on difference probability distribution. The probability distribution by which the inter-arrival time can be modeled include:
- Exponential Distribution or Markov distribution
- Constant or Deterministic
- Hyper - exponential
- Arbitrary or General distribution
