2yhvgkijgkhghcu ufggccgxuggugf uxigig7fg(GG cheeks bait garnet on my fb care bent RB be rn be rn me rn be db be FN vs fb gee en vs
<span>Schlosser next focuses on the safety not just of factory workers in the meatpacking industry, but of the meat itself that that industry produces. Schlosser notes, throughout the chapter, that it is actually quite difficult to track the source of food-borne pathogens in the United States. There are several reasons for this, some more preventable than others: a great deal of meat is produced in this country; government oversight in meatpacking plants is rather low; and meat production is a complex system with many inputs, making cause and effect hard to determine.</span>
Answer:
Hannah knew that if she got one last question wrong, she would fail her test. There was especially one question she couldn't figure the answer for. Hannah had to chose between A and C. C sounded fairly reasonable but she decided to chose letter A. So, she turned her test in. When the results came back she got a low D and saw how she didn't follow her gut well enough and got a bad score! Now, Hannah knew that she messed up and failed her test. She would try harder and better next time.
Explanation:
i hope this is okay i made this all up.
i couldn't really think of anything else :)
I don't know if I can get three. It is important to understand that the play is actually about the supposedly irreconcilable differences between science and religion.
Two of the 3 central characters, Hornbeck and particularly Brady, are too flawed to represent well science and religion. Brady is a metaphor for all that is bad in religion. He is seen as a bigoted monster. He is overconfident and has a shallow understanding of the world. His wisdom, if he has any at all, comes from his misreading of the Bible. His understanding is further marred by his greed and his desire to win at any cost.
Hornbeck is no better. He's a walking stand up comic that moves the play along by being the comic relief. It's not part of your question so I'll just move along.
The Title itself is a metaphor for what religion can do. Jeremiah Brown is determined to undermine the truth that is at the core of the play. He goes so far in his denunciations, that even Brady can see that it is too far. Inherit the Wind comes from Proverbs 11:29 and it is well worth quoting that, because both Brown and Brady sow enough discord that they are those who will "inherit the wind." Brown actually does inherit the wind. He is left with nothing. His righteousness is barren and it has left him barren.
So here are the answers to your question.
1. Religion is seen not as Bert Cates saw it (A comfort), but as something that can lead to an inheritance of the wind.
2. Religion is seen as something shallow as seen through the eyes of Drummand when he studies Brady in the courtroom
3. Religion is seen as mindless when some of the townspeople welcome Brady.
Sorry. You get my long answer for the night. There is no easy way to answer your question.
Answer:
A lot of foreign films are subtitled.
