Answer:
He pulls out Holden's latest essay on the Egyptians and reads its aloud, right down to Holden's degrading note: "I know this is junk, so it's OK if you flunk me, don't worry about it"
Brainliest please if this helped :)
Happy learning!
--Applepi101
Go ahead and get your number and then you will get your number so I will send you your text when you get home ok thanks for thanksgiving I have a good bye bye I know you are doing good ok I just wanna talk about it ok you know you are you doing ok well I’ll be ok bye ok I just wanted you to let me you know I’m sorry and your family owoeoeoeoeoeoeoeoeoew you are ok I don’t know ♂️ is doing anything this week I’m so confused ♂️ and I said I don’t know what to do but
War since before texas got annexed, mexico told the US that if texas gets annexed by the congress, it would mean war
The setting is the place, location, time and etc. The setting could influence the characters to be a specific way. It's a key detail, and changing that detail could change the way the characters see, feel, or act. Often times, if the setting is changed, the entire story would be different. The plot also depends on the setting. Let's say you're in two different environments. A festive party, and a gloomy cemetery. Which one would you more likely hear laughter in? Which one with jokes? Sad weeping? Spooky noises? Which one would likely be a mystery about the death of a person? These are influenced by the setting.
If you need further elaboration, you can search up more examples.
Answer:
This is my whole responce please paraphrase
Explanation:
In Shirley Chisholm’s Speech “People and Peace, Not Profits and War.” Chisholm uses introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion, all of which are effective in her speech to strengthen her argument that the military should not be pouring so much of the government’s money into the Vietnam War. Chisholm also uses ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen her argument. An excellent example of Confirmation in Chisholm’s speech is the quote, “The new secretary of health, education, and welfare, Robert Finch, came to the Hill, to tell the House Education and Labor Committee that he thinks we should spend more on education, particularly in city schools. But, he said, unfortunately, we cannot “afford” to, until we have reached some kind of good solution to the Vietnam War.” (30) This quote establishes credibility for Chisholm as she uses the opinion of another credible person to help with the argument of how spending money on the war has consequences for American citizens. Another example that Chisholm uses that fit a classical argument is a narrative” I was one of the many Americans who hoped it would mean that our country would benefit from the fresh perspectives, the new ideas, the different priorities of a leader who had no part in the mistakes of the past. Mr. Nixon had said things like this: “If our cities are to be livable for the next generation, we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problems that beset them and to the tensions that tear them apart.” And he said, “When you cut expenditures for education, what you are doing is shortchanging the American future.” (10). Chisholm uses Narration of Nixon’s words and hers to share the dissatisfaction with how Nixon is dealing with the war and the money of America. Her claim is strengthened due to the fact she uses Nixon’s own words against him since Nixon preached many things that he would do, and Chisholm says, “But frankly, I have never cared too much what people say. What I am interested in is what they do.” That statement shows that when Nixon didn't prove his claims together with his actions, Chisholm was quite disappointed. Chisholm's speech does an excellent job of convincing her audience on how we should think of the well-being of Americans and not just war. she uses many rhetorical elements that help her claims.
