Early modern philosophy in Europe and Great Britain is awash with discussions of the emotions: they figure not only in philosophical psychology and related fields, but also in theories of epistemic method, metaphysics, ethics, political theory and practical reasoning in general. Moreover, interest in the emotions links philosophy with work in other, sometimes unexpected areas, such as medicine, art, literature, and practical guides on everything from child-rearing to the treatment of subordinates. Because of the breadth of the topic, this article can offer only an overview, but perhaps it will be enough to give some idea how philosophically rich and challenging the conception of the emotions was in this period. Most attention will be devoted to the familiar figures of early modern philosophy and how they conceived of the emotions as valuable, even indispensable aspects of embodied human life, which were largely constitutive of the self and identity that matter to us practically.
A word of caution is in order: there is a plethora of source material, and this entry is offered as a survey for organizing that material. Alas, much worthy material must be excluded here. This article and its supplements are designed for readers browsing for specific information, as well as those hardy souls who may wish to read it straight through. The main document offers a thematic overview of early modern discussions of the emotions. Separate links lead to documents devoted to the pre-history of the topic, as well as to some of the most important individual figures in early modern philosophy. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please this took me a lot of time!
<span>A reason Jamestown settlers struggled to survive was that they lacked even the most basic farming techniques that were required to grow sustainable crops. </span>
Answer:
Left with huge financial debt after the war Britain. Failed to receive their promised land American Indians. Bore the burden of new taxes to pay for the war colonists.
Explanation:
If this is what your looking for.
Answer: Umm i got this from an an article and made it shorter
Explanation:
After the World War I, with millions washed away, people thought it was the end, but the break of World War II was even more worst than World War I. World War II or also known as the Second World War was fought between 1939 – 1945 in the Europe and Asia.
It was the worst of wars where more than 38 million people died and the most destructive war in the history of mankind. More than 50 nations took part in the war and it did change the world forever.
After the World War I, though the peace treaty was signed, this was the actual cause for another war. Germany was totally devastated from the war and it was then the Nazi Leader Hitler who took over and started his rule. It was the conquering of Europe by Hitler that eventually began the World War II from Europe. His invasion to Poland was the reason. Germany tried to conquer Britain but failed as they could not beat the Britain Royal Air force.
This was the largest armed battle in the history with the usage of deadly weapons, warplanes, battleships and first usage of nuclear bombs which took place. There was killing of innocent people in massive scale. By 1939, Germans troops invaded Poland and by 1941 the US also joined the war thereby taking the leadership too. By 1945, Germany surrendered thereby ending the war in Europe.
However the war in the Pacific did not end, until the US dropped two atomic bombs in Japan which was the most devastating action in history and by 1945 Japan also surrendered.
The after effects of this World War II is still being suffered by the people of Japan, even after decades has passed by. The World War II was one among the most destructive wars in the history of the world.
