Answer:
Napoleon was a cunning, ruthless, and a skilled military strategist who effectively declared war against numerous coalitions of European nations and extended his empire.
Explanation:
Napoleon Bonaparte, born in 1769, was a French military and political leader who rose to power during the French revolution. He crowned himself emperor in 1804, after securing political authority in France in a coup d'état in 1799. From his most great accomplishments, one was the Napoleonic Code, which has standardized the French legal system. It systemized to civil code including subjects such as colonial relations, property, family, and human rights. On 21 October 1805, the Battle Of Trafalgar contested along the coast of southwest Spain between Britain's Royal Navy and Napoleonic France and Spain's combined fleets. the victory of the Royal Navy halted ambitious France under Napolean.
There are scientific sources that affirm that communism is the extreme form of socialism, others affirm that after the Second World War, socialism appeared as a transformed form of communism.
Now, in terms of the economic focus of both we have;
COMMUNISM:
<em>The goods of production are handled by all, that is to say that the concept of property within the goods of production is annulled.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The production is related only to meet human needs, without the need for money.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Look for the condition in which material abundance exists.
</em>
SOCIALISM:
<em>The means of production are from public companies or cooperatives.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Individuals are compensated according to the principle of individual contribution.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Production can be coordinated by economic planning or economic markets.</em>
Answer:
D. all of the above
Explanation:
assimilation is the process of taking individuals or social groups and absorbing them into mainstream culture. To do so with the Dawes Act, the Native Americans had to do all those things.
They thought of possible ideas and wrote them down hope this helps!
It really depends on the perspective you put it into. If you were a African that was taken from your home land, and forced to board a ship with hundreds of other Africans were you could barely stand, wouldn't you say the trade of slaves? But this also brought economic wealth to the Americas and it also help support the trade of sugar. This can be debatable though.
