Immediate conflicts:
... The USA had atomic weapons and the USSR did not. (The US would not share that technology with the Soviets.)
... The USSR did not assure that free and fair elections took place in Eastern Europe -- it saw to it that Soviet-aligned governments were installed there.
... Tensions over the East Germany / West Germany and East Berlin / West Berlin division of territory.
Deeper causes:
The USA was committed to capitalism and democratic institutions of government.
The USSR was committed to communism and imposed authoritarian government.
The Cold War was mostly a tension between these worldviews.
The name of the king of the Hittites as described in the Preamble is Suppiluliumas I.
<h3>Which was the Hittites King name?</h3>
Suppiluliumas I, can be decribed as one which is been known to the Hittite king around c. 1380 and was able to dominate the history of the ancient Middle East.
It should be noted that hew dominated for the greater part of four decades a as regards the Hittite kingdom to Imperial power.
Learn more about Hittites at:
brainly.com/question/16717125
#SPJ1
Answer: Bias by omission.
- <em>Bias by omission</em> refers to the exclusion of relevant information. In this case, removing mention of the British would be a bias of omission.
- <em>Bias by source choice</em> happens when an author only looks at a certain type of source, especially when this type is likely to confirm the opinion of the author.
- <em>Unintentional bias</em> occurs when the author's personal beliefs or ideology are unconsciously introduced in the text.
- <em>Bias by arrangement</em> happens when a story is purposely designed to be more accessible to readers, therefore minimizing the impact of other stories. This happens when the media covers only one type of stories.
Answer:
The North was fighting for reunification, and the South for independence. But as the war progressed, the Civil War gradually turned into a social, economic and political revolution with unforeseen consequences. The Union war effort expanded to include not only reunification, but also the abolition of slavery
Answer:
He replaced the elected consuls and the Senate with an empire that could be inherited by members of the ruler's family.
Explanation:
Sulla, not being the Emperor in the modern sense of the word, he, however, possessed sole and unlimited power in the republic. His dictatorship dates back to 83-80 years BC, but the period of his sole rule began, in fact, in the 88th, when Sulla was elected consul. He held this post for eight years against all laws, including the Constitution. Formally, democratic institutions existed under him. There was even a second consul. But this consul was 'technical,' fulfilling the will of Sulla. There was a Senate, which was controlled in the same way by a dictator. The death of Sulla did not lead to major changes. The transition to one-man rule was a matter of time.