1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
atroni [7]
3 years ago
15

What leaders were in charge of the allies (the good side) during world war ii?

History
1 answer:
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
7 0
Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt. Winston was the British prime minister and Franklin was the US President. <span />
You might be interested in
In 1950, the United Nations- and the United States- became involved in a military conflict Korea. Fighting lasted there until 19
sdas [7]
The Korean War. North and South Korea are still technically at war. An armistice was signed in 1953 to halt fighting, but no final treaty was signed, unlike after World War 2.

United States, NATO allies and South Korea fought against North Korea, who received aid from Chinese forces.

This an example of actual combat during the so-called Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union between 1945-1991. The two sides had different ideologies (democracy vs. communism), which led to friction.
3 0
3 years ago
Which governor purchased Jekyll Island for the state of Georgia?
Arturiano [62]
Elllis arnols perchased jekyll island for the state of georgia in 1886
4 0
4 years ago
How did militarism come about and how did it contribute to the rising tension that led to WW1?
Alona [7]
Militarism affected the nations of World War 1 because of the fact that the Nations relied upon the Military for protection from the war. Countries massed produced weapons and arms while the countries leaders ended up being Military leaders. The country that was the most Military inclined was that of Germany.
7 0
3 years ago
Which position won more support in coastal areas
borishaifa [10]
It will be the federalists
6 0
3 years ago
Do u think a single-issue party could be widely accepted in the U.S why
seropon [69]
No because if every one has to agree with one party then there would be no reason to vote because you will not have a party to debate the issue
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Caesar use success in Gaul to improve his political position in Rome?
    7·1 answer
  • LAST QUESTION! The general willingness of firms to produce and sell a product at various prices is __________. demand supply qua
    12·1 answer
  • This is from the book "Outsiders"
    12·1 answer
  • What were the 3 main causes of the Civil War?​
    15·2 answers
  • List the reasons that river valley's were the "cradles of Civilization.
    12·1 answer
  • When you make a choice the experience from what would have been your second option is called
    13·2 answers
  • President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society initiatives were based on which of these assumptions?
    10·2 answers
  • which historical events are in the correct chronological order? crusades - renaissance - neolithic revolution - roman empire
    13·1 answer
  • True or false prehistory is before humans walked upright
    5·2 answers
  • Who is better juice WRLD or XXXTENTACION
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!