What was the purpose of the Open Door Policy?

2 answers:

6 0

During the twentieth century, the imperialist model stimulated tensions and competition among capitalist powers, who invested heavily in armaments to protect their territories. At the same time, the diplomacy of these nations worked to build military alliances that offered guarantees in a possible major conflict.

However, the US was a measure that went against this trend, introducing the "open door policy". According to this precept, all the great capitalist nations would have equal rights in carrying out the colonization and administration of their territories. In this way, the climate of competition and distrust would be reversed and this was the main objective.

allsm [11]3 years ago

4 0

The Open Door policy proposed to keep China open to trade with all countries on an equal basis; therefore, no international power would have full control of the country. Hope I helped. :)

You might be interested in

what was the role of economics in driving political changes resulting from the neolithic and industrial revolution

WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

Economic transformation changes the balance of power in a society and this leads to changes in politics and structure.

Explanation:

Neolithic Revolution: the shift to agriculture meant the beginning of cities and larger populations. The small clans with a more or less simple social organization started to give way to more complex societies structured around the crop and the agricultural cycle. Trade and the specialization of work were also factors that altered the social structure. The first notions of property appeared and with them a sharper division of people.

Industrial revolution: the emergence of Capitalists and Merchants challenged the political order of the time. The land was no longer the main attribute of wealth, and titles and honors were less important that factories and workers. Yet, in many nations, industrialist did not have the same political status as noblemen and landlords. The economy changed that.

7 0

3 years ago

Lunchroom fight evidence context?

siniylev [52]

Answer:

that there was a fight in the lunchroom during lunch. You've asked many ... student Handout - lunchroom Fight: evidence Context Handout.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Why did the creoles oppose the presence of the peninsulars?

AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

Explanation:

La historiografía tradicional sobre las independencias ha tendido a considerar éstas como el resultado de un conflicto de naciones, guerras de liberación nacional, en el que unas preexistentes naciones americanas se liberaban de una también preexistente nación española. En esta interpretación la existencia de dos formas de identidad colectiva de carácter protonacional, criollos (nacidos en América) y peninsulares (nacidos en Europa) ha tenido un papel determinante. Las guerras de independencia habrían sido el resultado de un enfrentamiento entre identidades colectivas definidas por el lugar de nacimiento. Una afirmación que hoy muy pocos historiadores se atreverían a mantener de forma explícita pero que sigue siento el trasfondo último del relato hegemónico sobre las independencias americanas.

2La propuesta de este trabajo es tanto discutir esta idea como desentrañar las funciones que ha cumplido en una historiografía que ha interpretado las guerras de independencia hispanoamericanas como guerras de liberación nacional. Para sustentar esta hipótesis se necesitó partir de la existencia previa de identidades colectivas con densidad política en el interior de la Monarquía Católica y lo más parecido que se encontró fue un supuesto conflicto criollos-peninsulares. Mi propuesta es que las naciones no fueron la causa de las guerras de independencia y que el enfrentamiento entre peninsulares y criollos, en el que la interpretación anterior se sustenta, es poco más que una bella leyenda, un mito historiográfico que forma parte del proceso de imaginación nacional latinoamericano y no de la realidad histórica.

8 0

3 years ago

Discovered the three laws of motion

JulsSmile [24]

Sir Isaac Newton Newton's first law states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state by the action of an external force.

The second law explains how the velocity of an object changes when it is subjected to an external force. The law defines a force to be equal to change in momentum (mass times velocity) per change in time.

The third law states that for every action (force) in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction.

5 0

3 years ago

Write next to each sentence weather it is revolutionary or not revolutionary.

Oduvanchick [21]

1. Not revolutionary
2. Revolutionary
3. Not revolutionary
4. Revolutionary
5. Revolutionary
6. Revolutionary
I think these are correct, sorry if they’re not!

8 0

3 years ago