1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
77julia77 [94]
2 years ago
6

Which of the following was NOT a condition of the berlin conference?

History
1 answer:
Readme [11.4K]2 years ago
5 0
B cause they were trying to understand the e ways of the being figured out during that
You might be interested in
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the “liberal consensus,”and how was this related to the Rockefeller Republicans?
Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

The "liberal consensus" was the tacit agreement between the Democratic and Republican Parties in the United States Congress during the 1960s, through which they would support and approve bills related to social security, with the aim of guaranteeing better and greater rights to American citizens.

These policies were mainly promoted by Democratic politicians, who held the majority of the presidency during that decade through John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. But many moderate Republicans also supported these measures, being led by, among others, Nelson Rockefeller, then-Governor of New York, who drew support from East Coast Republicans for many of the Democratic Party measures.

5 0
3 years ago
What were all of Jackson's economic policies?
solong [7]

While there are many policies that he implemented, four policies defined his presidency. In an effort to flush the corruption out of Washington, he established the spoils system. He took a hard stance against Native Americans, forcing them to choose between assimilation or relocation with the Indian Removal Act.
Plz mark me as brainliest :)
7 0
3 years ago
Which resulted in rebellions in greece, france, and the habsburg empire in the mid-1800s?.
Nata [24]

Answer:

rise of nationalism in Europe after the defeat of Napoleon

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read the excerpt.
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

Vicksburg was essential to controlling the Mississippi River.

Explanation:

The city of Vicksburg in Mississippi was one of the most important locations that would help determine who succeeds in the Civil War. And it was the desire to conquer this city that Lincoln famously declared as "the key".

Vicksburg was along the Mississippi River and also a major stronghold of the Confederate troops. The capture of this city would determine which way the War will sway. Abraham Lincoln considered it important because it was essential to the controlling of the Mississippi River.

Thus, the correct answer is the third option.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A key institution that did not directly arise from​ post-wwii negotiations was the
    14·1 answer
  • What important English document limited absolute power of the king
    14·2 answers
  • Which group was most responsible for the spread of the bubonic plague to europe?
    5·1 answer
  • Which kind of media best completes the title of the graphic?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the impact on the French of the levee en Masse
    15·1 answer
  • How was the art of ancient Mesopotamia different from that of earlier cultures?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements does not describe a benefit of sweatshops?
    7·2 answers
  • 3. Study the changes in population graph, what % lived in cities by the 1930's?<br> By the 1970's?
    7·1 answer
  • Need help fast, serious answers please.
    7·2 answers
  • Which group worked to reduce alcohol consumption?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!