Answer:
It sold it self and moved to a bigger state
Explanation:
its not the right answer srry
They are unrelated. Present day traditionalists are attached to guaranteeing that the Second Amendment was made so the nationals could oppose oppression and help battle to protect the Constitution, including the First Amendment. It wasn't. This is revisionist history. It was made to keep Congress and Congress alone from restricting the privilege to remain battle ready, which would keep the states from setting up local armies utilizing residents' weapons.
Actually, the states dependably had the ability to direct guns any way they needed, in light of the fact that at first, the Second Amendment didn't make a difference to them by any means. They likewise had the ability to confine discourse and the press et cetera, on the grounds that the First Amendment didn't have any significant bearing to them either.
Answer:
I will tell you but what I will get in return was sorry to forgive you.
Answer:
"The Boston Tea Party was a significant event in the growth of the American Revolution. Parliament responded in 1774 with the Intolerable Acts, or Coercive Acts, which, among other provisions, ended local self-government in Massachusetts and closed Boston's commerce."
Explanation: Wikipedia
Espero que te ayude!
Pedro Juan Caballero, Dr. José Gaspar Rodriguez de Francia, Mariano Antonio Molas, Fulgencio Yegros, Vicebte Ignacio Iturbe, y otros.
