This question is about the article "Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife"
Most proof proposes that the horses are indeed a local animal varieties, supporting the contention that the horses should have really been in North America for over 11,000 years.
<h3> Which statement best delineates the claim?.</h3>
Correct answer is option B.
- The horses' Spanish orgins have been verified by DNA analysis, and this common ancestry helps support the argument that there is now a serious problem of inbreeding in the horse population.
 
- As indicated by the article, wild horses of Spanish beginning were taken to North America with Columbus and his company. 
- They kept these horses in Mexico, on Colombus' second journey to the landmass in 1493. 
- The horses that were gotten around then were E. caballus, which from where Mexico is today, started to spread across the Great Planices, mixing in an area of the USA and bringing about the local species we know today.
Therefore, correct answer is option B.
For more information about North American Wildlife, refer he following link:
brainly.com/question/19151070
 
        
             
        
        
        
Example of actions speaking louder than words: let’s say you ask your friend not to do something and they say they won’t do it again but they continue to do it then you bring it up again and they say they won’t but continue to do it. Their actions are speaking louder than their words. 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
autobiography, 
since she's writing it about herself
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer: In the 1960s, the South was a place African Americans fled, seeking better jobs and better lives in the North in what was known as the Great Migration. But in recent years that flow has switched and led to what’s become known as the Great Reverse Migration, with large numbers of African-Americans moving South again.
Explanation: