The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Rulers of the early modern era differed in their methods of establishing authority in that most of them were absolute monarchs that possessed huge kingdoms due to their conquests and imperialistic ideas.
The early modern era is considered to be from the 15th century to the 18th century and the Age of Enlightenment in Europe. During that period in the history of humanity, Europe was ruled by powerful kings that ruled over many territories in different parts of the world. It was the time of navigation and exploration that made possible the discovery of new routes to India, Africa, and the discovery of the Americas. Kings invested a lot of money in this exploration because it was the way to conquer new lands and exploit their raw materials and natural resources for the benefit of their kingdoms. These Kings -more than leaders- were absolutists that exerted total power over their subjects, who had limited or no rights.
Answer:
B
explanation: i just took the quiz i got it wrong but it showed the right answer, youre welcome
C. survival
<span>it's basic human instinct.
Hope This Helps!</span>
<span>During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship between the two nations was a tense one. Americans had long been wary of Soviet communism and concerned about Russian leader Joseph Stalin’s tyrannical, blood-thirsty rule of his own country. For their part, the Soviets resented the Americans’ decades-long refusal to treat the USSR as a legitimate part of the international community as well as their delayed entry into World War II, which resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of Russians. After the war ended, these grievances ripened into an overwhelming sense of mutual distrust and enmity. Postwar Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe fueled many Americans’ fears of a Russian plan to control the world. Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as American officials’ bellicose rhetoric, arms buildup and interventionist approach to international relations. In such a hostile atmosphere, no single party was entirely to blame for the Cold War; in fact, some historians believe it was inevitable.</span>
