1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
14

Why are secondary sources important to the study of history?

History
1 answer:
sweet [91]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Secondary sources are important to study history because these sources provide information written by other authors. Direct information or testimonies from the people who were part of the historical events are called primary resources.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How can Congress pass a bill over a presidential veto?
icang [17]

Answer:

B~Congress can pass a vetoed bill with a 2/3 majority vote in both houses.

Explanation:

GradPoint

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the states compromise about slavery well writing the Constitution?
Effectus [21]

Answer: Nevertheless, slavery received important protections in the Constitution. The notorious three-fifths clause—which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population in apportioning representation—gave the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College.

Explanation: wait for another person to answer in case im wrong

7 0
3 years ago
Did Massachusetts home differ from the Pequot ? If so how
irinina [24]

Answer:

Pequot War, war fought in 1636–37 by the Pequot people against a coalition of English settlers from the Massachusetts Bay, Connecticut, and Saybrook colonies and their Native American allies (including the Narragansett and Mohegan) that eliminated the Pequot as an impediment to English colonization of southern New England

Explanation:

he Pequot War (1637–1638) was a conflict between the Pequot tribe and the English colonists of the Massachusetts Bay, Plymouth, and Saybrook. Small Planet Communications,

6 0
3 years ago
How did the opposing sides of the Revolutionary War compare with each other?
victus00 [196]
Well, the Americans were fighting in common territory. the British were fighting on foreign land. The British had [plenty of food, good uniforms, trained commanders and new rifles and supplies. The American officer had fairly the same training as British officers. In the French& Indian war, such ones as Washington and Israel Putnam had fought extraordinarily in that war. The rebels used guerrilla fighting in the areas where they could easily maneuver and escape. Also, one British army was required to fight over one large area as opposed to numerous groups of Continental forces.

Rebels also had disadvantages such as no government and no real means of funding its forces. But it had motivation. Unlike the British, they were fighting for their families and rights. They had good lines of communication and numerous routes of escape in the case of defeat. Also, Britain was at odds with many European countries, who eagerly lent aid with the great victories won by the Americans
4 0
4 years ago
Some one who is good in social study ​
Inessa05 [86]
John locke. i just learned this in social studies:)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did trade with Central Asia influence Tang Chinese culture?
    15·1 answer
  • Before the advent of steamboats, what kinds of boats did farmers use to transport goods down the mississippi river?
    15·1 answer
  • True or False: Before the advent of OSHA, a cohesive system of separate rules existed that effectively governed the American wor
    11·2 answers
  • What are latitude lines
    15·2 answers
  • An indentured servant brought to Jamestown and other colonies was given freedom once
    14·2 answers
  • In the 19th century, which trait was used to label a person as Caucasoid?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these was president Lincoln’s central goal during civil war?
    7·1 answer
  • Someone help me due tmr.!!
    13·1 answer
  • What is the point of view of the Byzantine knight?
    15·1 answer
  • The cases of Miranda v. Arizona, Mapp v. Ohio, and Gideon v. Wainwright are all related to which of the following? (5 points)
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!