There are several ways you can think about this split—the wild vs. the domesticated, the free vs. the enslaved, the rugged individual vs. society, the genuine vs. the artificial. I think the message of the poem, however, has to do with freedom of expression and the need to be independent of corrupting social influences
He uses various rhetorical means of proving his claims such as appealing to emotions. He presents the case of the King's behavior in such a way that is supposed to elicit an emotional response from the reader and motivate them to support the rebellion. Not only that but it is also masked as common sense so as to make it seem sensible.
ከመኸነ ወየፈሐ ጸነወሐ ነኸጸየ ጠኸነ መጰ ነ
Resourses deplete faster,
<span>thinking towards the future, </span>
<span>building structures and cities up instead of out</span>
