1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina1246 [14]
4 years ago
5

Until 1987, in cases of extradition,

History
1 answer:
a_sh-v [17]4 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is C) the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.

Until 1987, in cases of extradition, the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.

For extradition, we understand the faculty that the government of the United States has to surrender a fugitive to other country or state because it has to face criminal charges.

With the Supreme Case of "Kentucky vs. Dennison" in 1860, the federal court did not have the authority to demand the return of a fugitive to another state. This changed in 1987 with the resolution of the case "Puerto Rico v. Brandstand," that overruled the "Kentucky vs. Dennison" case.

You might be interested in
A mountain range creates two different <br> . (climates/landforms)
irina1246 [14]

Answer: Landforms

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first successful British colony of ? Was established by a joint stock company that hoped to profit from the venture
Vlad1618 [11]
England was financed by the Virginia Co.
6 0
3 years ago
Why is William the Conqueror considered an important monarch?
Y_Kistochka [10]
William the Conqueror was important because he established feudalism in Europe.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do the events in this timeline suggest about how the Supreme Court has interpreted equal protection
olasank [31]

The answer would be: D) It has interpreted equal protection as applying to different groups of people.

The Equal Protection clause is the last part of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the USA:

<em>"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." </em>

Hope this answer helps you:)!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When a government imposes a fine to coerce citizens to follow a law, which technique of enacting domestic policy is it employing
loris [4]
Authoritative


Hope I Helped You!!! :-)

<span>Have A Good Day!!!</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is oligarchy a limited or unlimited government?
    12·1 answer
  • 3) Why is voting such an important part of our government? Question 3 options: It is part of the First Amendment. It stops bad t
    15·2 answers
  • What are 2 reasons for the electoral college?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following tables best represents the technological transformation of the primary news sources in America?
    7·2 answers
  • Where did the following civilizations exist? Maya: Aztec: Inca:
    8·2 answers
  • While the han dynasty established the silk road, the tang dynasty developed the route to its fullest potential. Examine the map
    6·1 answer
  • Based on the map, which of these places is not part of Venice's commercial trade route?
    8·2 answers
  • How were nathaniel hawthorne and ralph waldo emerson's writings similar?
    8·1 answer
  • How has the relationship between state and local governments changed
    6·2 answers
  • Compare and Contrast the efforts of Martin
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!