1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reil [10]
3 years ago
7

How do ideological parties and single-issue parties differ from one another? A. Ideological parties tend to be more liberal, whi

le single-issue parties tend to be more conservative. B. Ideological parties focus on certain beliefs, while single-issue parties focus on one main concern. C. Single-issue parties tend to be more liberal, while ideological parties tend to be more conservative. D. Single-issue parties focus on certain beliefs, while ideological parties focus on one main concern.
History
2 answers:
ra1l [238]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is "B".

Ideological parties are formed by a group of individuals who share a group of beliefs related to political and economic affairs. on the other hand, single-issue parties focus their political strategy on supporting one single belief. Single-issue parties don't have a favorable history of political victories. However, they tend to be more successful in voluntary voting systems, such as the United States electoral system.

jonny [76]3 years ago
5 0
The Answer would be B
You might be interested in
During World War II, the US government sent people of Japanese ancestry to internment camps based on
Elenna [48]

Answer:

suspicions of sedition and for overall interest of national security

Explanation:

Japan bombed Pearl Harbor which brought the United States into WW2. Some basic geography shows that Japan is west of the US in the Pacific Ocean. At the time, many Japanese immigrants (most of them were born in the United States) lived on the west coast in California. If Japan launched an invasion, the US was worried they would recruit or use Japanese immigrants as soldiers or spies.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the naacp's views on american society
Delicious77 [7]
He NAACP opposed racist views that terrorized and segregated people of color. They were an intellectual group that help to bring about fairer education (Brown vs. Board of Education, 1957) kinder housing and anti-lynching, They felt all humans should be treated with justice, kindness and equality and lobbied to foster positive change in America. (Thank goodness they brought awareness to so much cruelty and injustice. It still makes me cringe to think the U.S. was and still is so uninformed about human issues.)<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
The percentage of the rocks on the earths surface that are sedimentary rocks is
pentagon [3]
<h3>the percentage of the rocks on the earths surface that are sedimentary rocks is</h3><h3 /><h2><em><u>75 percent</u></em></h2><h2 />

<em>Sedimentary rocks make up 75 percent of the rocks at the earth's surface but only 5percent of the outer 10 miles of the earth. Sediment, as distinguished fromsedimentary rock, is a collective name for loose, solid particles and is generally derived from weathering and erosion of preexisting rock</em>

hope it helps you ❤

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Germans need to defeat France as quickly as<br> possible in 19142
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

The German nightmare was a war on two fronts. Historically, Russia needed time to ‘mobilize’, that is, to call up reservists, equip them, and assign them to their regiments and platoons. So the logical way of operating was to attack and defeat the French first, before attacking the Russians. But in 1914 the Russians cheated; they mobilised before they announced it so their army was in the field quite a long time before the Germans expected it — and the dreaded war on two fronts materialised. The Germans were lucky in that their effective commander Ludendorff (who was technically 2ic) moved his troops about by train, so they were not already exhausted by a long and hurried march and were able to throw the Russians back into complete confusion and surrender.

So the Russians were defeated but not mortally injured, the French came close to defeat but just managed to stabilise a front, and the ‘despicable English Army’ saved itself from disaster by the narrowest Of margins.

Four years of continuous bloody slaughter were assured.

Glad I can Help

4 0
3 years ago
6.
Lelu [443]

Answer:That is indeed very much adequate

Explanation:(True false) 2+2 is 4 -1 that’s 3 quick maths

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement is not true of the U.S. economy in the late 1920s? Construction of new homes fell. Automobile production caused
    13·2 answers
  • Which phrase best describes the main reason for colonist’ anger about the Stamp Act? I think it’s “No taxation without represent
    6·2 answers
  • What is the primary mission of the us?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help me asap​
    12·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the scientific revolution to the study of history
    15·1 answer
  • What is one way a market economy effects the lives of private citizens ?
    9·1 answer
  • ¿Qué pasa si nos unimos a una muerte como la de Cristo?
    5·1 answer
  • According to the passage, what was true about the Minutemen?
    14·2 answers
  • True or false the romans developed the concept of "republic" in their government
    13·1 answer
  • What is the most widely used method for the ratification of an amendment to the Constitution?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!