Answer:
annual income = $70,292.52
Explanation:
initial outlay $900,000
in order to determine the net cash flows per year we can use the present value of an ordinary annuity:
PV = annual cash flow x annuity factor
- PV = $900,000
- annuity factor, 15%, 12 years = 6.1944
annual cash flow = $900,000 / 6.1944 = $145,292.52
annual cash flow = [(revenue - operating costs - depreciation) x (1 - tax rate)] + depreciation
- revenue - operating costs - depreciation = annual income
- tax rate = 0?
- depreciation = $900,000 / 12 = $75,000
$145,292.52 = annual income + $75,000
annual income = $145,292.52 - $75,000 = $70,292.52
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
C because you have to know how much you make coming in so they can see where you're at
Answer:
$150,000
Explanation:
Given that
Total revenue = $800,000
Explicit cost = $450,000
Implicit cost = $200,000
The computation of the accounting profit is as shown below :-
= Total revenue - Total cost
= $800,000 - $650,000
= $150,000
Total cost = Explicit cost -Implicit cost
= $450,000 + $200,000
= $650,000
Therefore for calculating the accounting profit we simply deduct the total cost from total revenue.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
Amount realized 22,000 Minus: Basis 89,000 Loss recognized 67000
<u>answer a </u>) Since Karen is single she can guarantee this lose as a common misfortune to a limit of $50,000. Karen won't have the option to guarantee the whole $67,000 that she lost she can just guarantee $50,000.
<u>answer b) </u>Since Karen is recording a joint government form she can guarantee a lose of upto $100,000. Karen will have the option to guarantee the whole loss of $67,000.
<u>answer c )</u> With the stock being bought from another investor as opposed to the sorting out enterprise she can guarantee the whole loss of $67,000 as a captial gain misfortune.
<u>answer d )</u> B. By selling a segment of the stock in one year and the staying stock in one more year Karen could change over the whole misfortune on the deal to a normal misfortune.
