Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
Answer:
Gathering publicly available comparable company information
Creating detailed forecasts for both companies
An accretion/dilution and sensitivity analysis
Determining and calculating items related to the acquisition structure
Answer:
Continuous Innovation.
Explanation:
This is simply known go be continuous improvement which explained as development to produce a positive result over time.
It is an iterative process of incorporating both modest, incremental and radical revolutionary improvements in processes, product designs, services and technologies.
Continuous innovation seeks not to just fulfill expectations but also create products and services that provide only imagined functions or even entirely unexpected revolutionary changes.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
with the tax you have to pay and the withdraw amount i would say that that woman will have a happy retierment and remodle her house
Answer:
Cost of Goods sold is $29
Explanation:
Under the perpetual LIFO or Last In First Out method of inventory valuation, we value the Cost of Goods Sold based on the price of the most recently purchased inventory before sale. Thus the units of closing inventory contains the inventory that was purchased first.
The cost of goods sold under LIFO will be,
Beginning Inventory (9* 3) = 27
Feb purchases (4 * 5) = 20
Oct sales (4 * 5 + 3 * 3) = (29)
Dec purchases (5 * 6) = 30
Ending Inventory = 48
So, the cost of goods sold under perpetual LIFO will comprise of the most recently purchased inventory before sale. The most recently purchased inventory before October sale was of February purchases. Thus, out of the 7 units sold, 4 will comprise of the February purchases and the remaining, 3 units, will be from the beginning inventory.
The cost of goods sold is,
COGS = 4 * 5 + 3 * 3
COGS = 29
