1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zolol [24]
3 years ago
15

PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS!!! THANK YOU SOOO MUCH!!!

History
1 answer:
bija089 [108]3 years ago
7 0

One

Your first instinct is probably to choose the free response essay. If you did, you would not be correct. A free response starts out with you making an opinion statement, but you have to be able to back it up, and your reasons ought to be logical.

DBQ you be your next guess, because the letters aren't well known and maybe it doesn't require any back up. Unfortunately it does. DBQ stands for Document Based Questions. That means you have to check things very carefully.

Globally Thinking Essay requires that you pick a global issue that you could apply to something local.

A process essay is what its name suggests. You are writing a procedure to do something. I don't think you need any backup material for this. You just have to give the right steps to do something. A document won't help you.

In my day this would not depend on any background notations if you were good enough. Simply writing an interpretation would be good enough. I don't think that's true now.

These terms are all knew to me but I would go with the process essay. It is cut and dried and I don't think it requires documentation, not at the level I'm thinking of. A scholarly paper might require great care in the directions for the procedure.

I'd pick D.

Two

A thesis statement should start out to be very general and then it should be confined in some way. Statements E (especially), D, C and B are too specific to start with. The true statement and general one is likely A.

Three

The definition of Histiography is the study of the way history is written. The first thing you say about any study should be what and not how. What is histiography? is the first thing you have to deal with. Top Down and Bottom up are methods of looking at history. Both are valid depending on what you are writing about. As usual I don't think any of them are really a choice or they all are. A is your best choice in my mind, but that's a poor choice of a bad lot.

The problem with the answers is that they suggest change. That's not what Histiography is is about. It is just the study of how history is written. For example Top Down is about the leaders who have created history and bottom up is how people have lived under that rule. There is no mention of one being superior to another or that we need to revise anything.

You might be interested in
What was the policy of Containment?
romanna [79]

Answer:

C is the correcta answer

Explanation:

Destroying communism in the soviet union by economic sanctions

5 0
3 years ago
Work out 0.28*7.8*0.32/2.1*0.52​
jek_recluse [69]

Ur all wrong..............

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the British in India and China. Describe how the British East India Trading Company was instrumental in tak
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer: i never learned this

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Explain how propaganda was used to mobilize populations (both in the home countries and the colonies) for the purpose of waging
malfutka [58]

Answer:

During World War One, propaganda was employed on a global scale.

Explanation:

Unlike previous wars, this was the first total war in which whole nations and not just professional armies were locked in mortal combat. This and subsequent modern wars required propaganda to mobilise hatred against the enemy; to convince the population of the justness of the cause; to enlist the active support and cooperation of neutral countries; and to strengthen the support of allies.

Furthermore, when the government needed to recruit lots of soldiers and wanted people to support them.  Posters were printed that made the army look exciting. Other posters told men it was their duty to join, that they would feel proud if they did and guilty or embarrassed if they didn't join.

3 0
3 years ago
when presidents appoint judges to the federal court, judges go to the bench for a term of "good behavior" which means they can s
Morgarella [4.7K]

Advantages

They need not fear that their vote will impeach them. In other words they get to vote their conscience.

The experience they gain from the years of service makes them experts in the particular law they are judging.

Disadvantage

Should they become ill (I'm thinking of the Supreme Court here), their vote may mean something if they are not there.

They become to set in their ways.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How have religious differences affected the Middle East?
    12·1 answer
  • After converting to Buddhism, Aśoka issued edicts about all of the following ideas, except:
    11·1 answer
  • Which substance describes a gaseous form of petroleum
    13·1 answer
  • What’s the most important freedom, according to James Madison?
    13·1 answer
  • II. True or False
    11·2 answers
  • How did the industry move from Britain to the United States?
    11·1 answer
  • The president has the power to veto, or reject, any bill passed by the United States Congress. This is an example of
    11·2 answers
  • Heyy! i’ll give brainliest please help
    15·2 answers
  • Which state had the smallest population in the house of representatives? How many?​
    10·1 answer
  • In which empire were the leaders called caliphs and encouraged knowledge and learning?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!